Evidence-based Evolution of the High Stakes Postgraduate Intensive Care Examination in Australia and New Zealand

Author:

Lee R. P.12,Venkatesh B.13,Morley P.14

Affiliation:

1. Joint Faculty of Intensive Care Medicine, Ulimaroa, Victoria, Australia

2. Past Chairman, Fellowship Examination in Intensive Care, Joint Faculty of Intensive Care Medicine Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists and Royal Australasian College of Physicians and Clinical Associate Professor, Northern Clinical School, University of Sydney, New South Wales.

3. Chairman of Examinations, Joint Faculty of Intensive Care Medicine, Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists and Royal Australasian College of Physicians and Professor of Intensive Care, Division of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Princess Alexandra and Wesley Hospitals, University of Queensland, Queensland.

4. Past Chairman, Fellowship Examination in Intensive Care, Joint Faculty of Intensive Care Medicine, Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists and Royal Australasian College of Physicians and Associate Professor, Clinical School, Royal Melbourne and Western Hospitals, The University of Melbourne, Victoria.

Abstract

The fellowship examination for intensive care medicine in Australia and New Zealand, first held in 1979, has undergone four major periods of development and change since inception. These periods are characterised as: 1. 1979 to 1996 – initiation and establishment of the exam as a relevant and comprehensive assessment process for a new specialty. 2. 1997 to 2001 – revision to increase breadth of coverage, increase reliability for a growing number of candidates and ensure that each candidate received the same exam: • Expansion: to incorporate assessment of CanMEDS skills (including communication, procedures and professional qualities). • Lengthening: to increase the number of exposures, to ensure reliability. • Quarantining of candidates: to allow the provision of a similar exam for each candidate. 3. 2002 to 2006 – increasing emphasis on examiner training, standard setting and increasing feedback to candidates to improve the educational experience and guide exam preparation. Blueprinting of questions to maintain validity. 4. 2008 onwards – logistic revision to ensure feasibility for a rapidly growing number of candidates and refinement to apply modem standard setting and quality control The exam has been regarded as a ‘tough but fair’ assessment in its 30 years of existence and the committee overseeing its development has aimed to continually review the process to maintain those qualities as well as reliability, validity and feasibility. The increasing number of candidates has allowed accumulation of usable statistics but has tested the feasibility of running such a labour intensive exam. To date, there have been 800 presentations to the exam with 498 successful candidates.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3