Anaesthesia Information—What Patients Want to Know

Author:

Garden A. L.12,Merry A. F.13,Holland R. L.13,Petrie K. J.14

Affiliation:

1. Green Lane Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand

2. Middlemore Hospital.

3. Green Lane Hospital.

4. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Science, University of Auckland.

Abstract

We developed and introduced into clinical practice a leaflet to improve the delivery of information to patients before obtaining their consent to anaesthesia. The amount of information needs to be what a “reasonable” patient thinks appropriate; therefore we tested patients’ responses to three levels of information: “full” disclosure, “standard” disclosure (as contained in our leaflet) and “minimal” disclosure. Forty-five patients scheduled to undergo cardiac surgery were enrolled in the study. None of the information sheets caused a significant change in state anxiety score and only the “full” disclosure significantly increased knowledge about anaesthesia (P=0.016). All leaflets were easy to understand. When only one leaflet was provided 64–73% of patients thought the content was “just right”, whereas when all three leaflets were viewed together, 63% of patients thought the “minimal” leaflet withheld too much information.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Reference12 articles.

1. Medical Council of New Zealand. A statement for the medical profession on information and consent. Wellington, 1995.

2. JohnstonJE. Psychological interventions and coping with surgery. In: BaumA, TaylorSE, SingerJE, eds. Handbook of Psychology and Health, volume 4. Hillsdale New Jersey: Erlbaum 1984; 167–188.

3. A risk-specific anesthesia consent form may hinder the informed consent process

4. Psychological effect of detailed preanesthetic information

5. The Effects of Providing Preoperative Statistical Anaesthetic-Risk Information

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3