Affiliation:
1. Department of Anaesthesia, Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, Tasmania
Abstract
We performed an audit of the insertion of the Single Use Portex Laryngeal Mask in 400 patients. Insertion was successful at first attempt in 335 out of 400 patients (83.8%). However in 15 patients (3.8%), the Portex laryngeal mask could not be placed despite repeated attempts. In 12 of these 15 patients (80%), a standard Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) was successfully placed. After the completion of the audit, 22 out of 29 anaesthetists (75.9%), who had inserted 5 Portex laryngeal masks, considered it inferior to the standard LMA. It would appear to us that the Portex laryngeal mask might need some design modifications to be a real alternative to the standard LMA.
Subject
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献