Bispectral Index in Assessment of Adequacy of General Anaesthesia for Lower Segment Caesarean Section

Author:

Yeo S. N.12,Lo W. K.13

Affiliation:

1. Department of Anaesthesiology, Kandang Kerbau Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore

2. Department of Anaesthesia and Surgical Intensivfe Care, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.

3. Consultant, Mount Elizabeth Hospital, Singapore.

Abstract

Awareness among parturients during general anaesthesia for caesarean section, though now uncommon, remains a concern for obstetric anaesthetists. We examined the adequacy of our general anaesthetic technique for avoiding explicit awareness by determining the depth of anaesthesia using Bispectral Index (BIS) monitoring. Twenty ASA 1 parturients having general anaesthesia for lower segment caesarean section were studied. The drugs and doses used for each anaesthetic were similar. Intraoperative Bispectral Index, haemodynamic parameters, end-tidal isoflurane concentration and inspired nitrous oxide fraction were measured and the postoperative incidence of explicit awareness was assessed. All anaesthetists were blinded to the Bispectral Index value throughout the operation. The depth of anaesthesia at various stages of the operation was evaluated by recording the Bispectral Index. Patients were interviewed for any intraoperative recall or awareness at the end of operation. A median BIS of 70 or below was recorded on most occasions during surgery. The range was 52 to 70, with values reaching 60 and below at intubation, uterine incision and delivery. Haemodynamic stability was satisfactory and there was no case of uterine atony, fetal compromise or postpartum haemorrhage. No patient experienced intraoperative dreams, recall or awareness. Our current general anaesthetic technique appeared inadequate to reliably produce BIS values of less than 60 that are associated with a low risk of awareness. However, no patients experienced explicit awareness.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cited by 26 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3