Validation of a Difficult Endotracheal Intubation Simulator Designed for Use in Anaesthesia Training

Author:

Brettig S.1,Shurgott M.2,Quinn S. J.3,Owen H.4

Affiliation:

1. Ovens Medical Group, Wangaratta, Victoria

2. Consultant Anaesthetist, Adelaide, South Australia

3. Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia

4. Anaesthesia and Pain Medicine, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia

Abstract

There is a need for a validated endotracheal intubation trainer that has variable difficulty settings for the training and assessment of medical practitioners. In this study three anatomical modifications were retrofitted to a commercial manikin and then validated. These modifications included restricted movements of the mandible as well as changes to the upper incisors. A total of 130 participants comprising specialists, trainees and medical students volunteered for this study. Validity was tested using randomised between-groups comparison of the time taken to intubate the manikin on all settings. Overall, and at each setting, there was a significant difference between the times to intubation among the three levels of experience (P <0.001). Novices were more than 12 times more likely to fail than experts (odds ratio [OR] 12.4, 95% confidence intervals [CI] 3.8, 41.8, P <0.001). The median time to intubation for all three groups changed significantly between settings 1 (easiest) and 4 (most difficult), novice 18 seconds (CI 8.9, 27.1, P <0.001), intermediate 15 seconds (CI 6.5, 23.5, P=0.001), and expert 9 seconds (CI 0.4, 17.6, P=0.04). The novice group was significantly different from the expert group at all attempts (P <0.002), and from the intermediates at all attempts apart from the third (P=0.055). The time for the novice and intermediate groups improved significantly by the fourth attempt, novice 15 seconds (CI 5.4, 24.6, P=0.002) and intermediate 10 seconds (CI 1.0, 19.0, P=0.03). Other aspects of validity were also satisfied during this study. A high degree of validity was established for these modifications, which can be retrofitted to an existing manikin and then used for teaching or assessment.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. A force sensor improves trainee technique for rigid endoscopy;The Journal of Laryngology & Otology;2024-01-17

2. Preliminary Experience With Inertial Movement Technology to Characterize Endotracheal Intubation Kinematics;Simulation in Healthcare: The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare;2020-05-11

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3