Affiliation:
1. Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Prince Henry Hospital, Little Bay, New South Wales
Abstract
Seventy patients undergoing haemorrhoidectomy under general anaesthesia were randomly allocated to one of five treatment groups in order to compare the effectiveness of various caudal agents in the control of postoperative pain. Four groups were given a caudal injection of either 2% lignocaine, 0.5% bupivacaine, 2% lignocaine + morphine sulphate 4 mg or normal saline + morphine sulphate 4 mg, while the fifth (control) group did not receive an injection. The number of patients requiring postoperative opiates was significantly higher in the lignocaine group than in the morphine (p <0.05) and morphine-lignocaine (p <0.05) groups. No agent significantly reduced the number requiring opiates. In those who received opiates, the mean analgesic period was 228 minutes in the control group, and was significantly longer following bupivacaine (577 min, p <0.01), morphine-lignocaine (637 min, p <0.05) and morphine (665 min, p <0.01). The mean analgesic period following lignocaine (349 min) was not significantly different from control. The incidence of catheterisation was lowest in those patients who did not receive caudal analgesia.
Subject
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
Cited by
19 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Pudendal Nerve;Regional Nerve Blocks in Anesthesia and Pain Therapy;2022
2. The Role of Pudendal Nerve Block in Colorectal Surgery: A Systematic Review;Journal of Investigative Surgery;2020-07-07
3. Pudendal Nerve Blockade;Regional Nerve Blocks in Anesthesia and Pain Therapy;2015
4. Evidence-based management of pain after haemorrhoidectomy surgery;British Journal of Surgery;2010-06-30
5. Evidence-based practice in haemorrhoidectomy;Colorectal Disease;2008-07-07