Affiliation:
1. University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, edward.miller@umb.edu
2. Brown University, Providence, RI
Abstract
Deficiencies in current long-term care (LTC) financing models are substantial and must be addressed if the nation is going to meet the needs of the growing population of frail and disabled elders. Because debate over reforming LTC financing has traditionally focused on the relative roles of the public and private sectors, this article examines what characteristics predispose LTC specialists to weigh one approach— public or private—more than the other. Data are derived from a Web-based survey of 1,147 individuals with known or demonstrable experience with LTC, including consumer advocates, provider representatives, policy experts, and public officials. Results suggest that support for spurring private sector mechanisms, bolstering the government’s role, and reforming Medicare and Medicaid vary with key characteristics of the respondents, including experiential, attitudinal, and background variables. Findings also suggest consensus that reform of LTC financing should improve on the current public—private partnership in this area.
Reference54 articles.
1. Voters and Health Reform in the 2008 Presidential Election
2. Casey, B., Oxley, H., Whitehouse, E., Antolijn, P., Duval, R. & Leibfritz, W. ( 2003, November 20). Policies for an ageing society: Recent measures and areas for further reform (Economics Department Working Papers No. 369). Paris, France: OECD.
3. Setting Eligibility Criteria for a Care-Coordination Benefit
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献