Affiliation:
1. The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston School of Public Health, TX, USA
2. University of California–San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
3. RAND Corporation, Arlington, VA, USA
Abstract
Contracting between private health plans and hospitals has been described as “chaos behind a veil of secrecy.” We develop a novel algorithm that classifies inpatient claims as one of three contract types—discounted charges, fixed rates, or per diems—and apply it to the 2009-2014 Colorado All Payer Claims Database. Of $1.1 billion in classifiable private health plan payments for inpatient care in Colorado, we find that 42.1% were fixed rates, 41.1% were discounted charges, and 16.0% were per diems. We find wide variation in contract types among private health plans and hospital types, and a pronounced shift over the study period in private plans’ contract types, away from discounted charges, and toward fixed rates. To test our algorithm’s validity, we apply it to Colorado Medicare and Medicaid claims—both of which are known primarily to pay using fixed rates—and find, reassuringly, that 86.3% of Medicare payments (98.6% when we exclude Medicare claims with special payment rules) and 79.7% of Medicaid payments are classified as fixed rates.
Funder
Rice University, Jones Graduate School of Business
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献