A Comparison of Telemedicine and Office Visit Payments in a Commercially Insured Population

Author:

Carey Kathleen1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Boston University School of Public Health, MA, USA

Abstract

In recent years, commercial insurers have been slowly advancing coverage for telemedicine, raising questions regarding payment. Many states now have laws that address telemedicine reimbursement and as of 2019, 10 required full payment parity. Using a large commercial insurance claims database, this study conducted two natural experiments to better understand whether payment parity is effective in driving more telemedicine provision. Payments for common outpatient procedures provided by telemedicine and in offices during 2018–2019 were examined according to whether the service was subject to payment parity. For medical visits, evidence of payment incentives in promoting telemedicine was limited, and for psychotherapy telemedicine payments were comparable or greater than office visit payments. As telemedicine escalated during the COVID-19 peak and continues to grow beyond the pandemic, a valuable message is that payment parity laws may be a less effective strategy for encouraging telemedicine use than presumed by many state policymakers.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Health Policy

Reference30 articles.

1. American Hospital Association. (2019). Fact Sheet. https://www.aha.org/factsheet/telehealth.

2. An Introduction to Propensity Score Methods for Reducing the Effects of Confounding in Observational Studies

3. Trends in Telemedicine Use in a Large Commercially Insured Population, 2005-2017

4. Berg J. (2019). Report finds only 10 states provide true telehealth payment parity. MedCity News, December 5. https://medcitynews.com/2019/12/report-finds-only-10-states-provide-true-telehealth-payment-parity/

5. Butler S. M. (2020). After COVID-19: Thinking differently about running the health care system. The JAMA Forum. June 23/30. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2767311?guestAccessKey=e0d9c17a-d0d7-41e4-bd33-ecdee920a91b&utm_source=silverchair&utm_campaign=jama_network&utm_content=healthpolicy_highlights&cmp=1&utm_medium=email

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3