Affiliation:
1. Boston University School of Public Health, MA, USA
Abstract
In recent years, commercial insurers have been slowly advancing coverage for telemedicine, raising questions regarding payment. Many states now have laws that address telemedicine reimbursement and as of 2019, 10 required full payment parity. Using a large commercial insurance claims database, this study conducted two natural experiments to better understand whether payment parity is effective in driving more telemedicine provision. Payments for common outpatient procedures provided by telemedicine and in offices during 2018–2019 were examined according to whether the service was subject to payment parity. For medical visits, evidence of payment incentives in promoting telemedicine was limited, and for psychotherapy telemedicine payments were comparable or greater than office visit payments. As telemedicine escalated during the COVID-19 peak and continues to grow beyond the pandemic, a valuable message is that payment parity laws may be a less effective strategy for encouraging telemedicine use than presumed by many state policymakers.
Reference30 articles.
1. American Hospital Association. (2019). Fact Sheet. https://www.aha.org/factsheet/telehealth.
2. An Introduction to Propensity Score Methods for Reducing the Effects of Confounding in Observational Studies
3. Trends in Telemedicine Use in a Large Commercially Insured Population, 2005-2017
4. Berg J. (2019). Report finds only 10 states provide true telehealth payment parity. MedCity News, December 5. https://medcitynews.com/2019/12/report-finds-only-10-states-provide-true-telehealth-payment-parity/
5. Butler S. M. (2020). After COVID-19: Thinking differently about running the health care system. The JAMA Forum. June 23/30. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2767311?guestAccessKey=e0d9c17a-d0d7-41e4-bd33-ecdee920a91b&utm_source=silverchair&utm_campaign=jama_network&utm_content=healthpolicy_highlights&cmp=1&utm_medium=email