Research Evidence on the Validity of Risk-Adjusted Mortality Rate as a Measure of Hospital Quality of Care

Author:

Thomas J. William1,Hofer Timothy P.1

Affiliation:

1. University of Michigan

Abstract

For more than 10 years, reports comparing quality of care in hospitals have been disseminated to the public. The most commonly used measure in these reports is hospital mortality rate. Despite the resources devoted to analyzing and disseminating mortality data, little attention has been given to the question of their validity as a quality measure. In this article, the authors synthesize findings from 18 articles identified as providing information relevant to this issue. From this review, the authors find evidence that poor quality care increases patients' risk of mortality and that, on average, quality of care provided in hospitals identified as high—mortality rate outliers is poorer than that provided in low—mortality rate outlier hospitals. Nevertheless, a clear conclusion from these studies is that when used as a measure of quality for individual hospitals, risk-adjusted mortality rates are seriously inaccurate. Publication of hospital mortality rates misinforms the public about hospital quality.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Health Policy

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3