Improving Consumer Understanding of Short-Term Health Insurance: An Experiment

Author:

Taha Ahmed E.1,Saks Michael J.2,Hall Mark A.3ORCID,Ellman Ira M.2

Affiliation:

1. Pepperdine University, Malibu, CA, USA

2. Arizona State University, Phoenix, USA

3. Wake Forest University, Winston Salem, NC, USA

Abstract

Short-term health insurance policies—made available with longer durations during the Trump Administration—offer substantially fewer consumer protections than do Affordable Care Act (“ACA”)–compliant policies. Federal regulations require short-term policies’ sellers to disclose possible ACA noncompliance to prospective buyers. This controlled experiment finds, however, that the federally required disclosure does not substantially improve consumer understanding of these policies’ coverage limitations. The experiment also finds that an enhanced disclosure greatly improves this understanding. Importantly, consumers’ preferences for ACA-compliant policies also increased with their comprehension of the coverage differences. Thus, the study demonstrates not only that easily implemented changes in the federally required disclosure would improve consumer understanding of the coverage differences but also that the improved understanding matters to consumers. However, even the enhanced disclosure left many respondents mistaken about some key limitations of short-term policies, suggesting that policymakers should consider other strategies to protect buyers of short-term health insurance.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Health Policy

Reference14 articles.

1. Mortality Effects and Choice Across Private Health Insurance Plans

2. Choice Inconsistencies among the Elderly: Evidence from Plan Choice in the Medicare Part D Program

3. Estimated Plan Enrollment Outcomes After Changes to US Health Insurance Marketplace Automatic Renewal Rules

4. Choose to Lose: Health Plan Choices from a Menu with Dominated Option*

5. Corlette S., Lucia K., Palanker D., Hoppe O. (2019). The marketing of short-term health plans: An assessment of industry practices and state regulatory responses (p. 9). https://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/publication/99708/moni_stldi_final_0.pdf

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3