HMO Use of Diagnostic Tests: A Review of the Evidence

Author:

Chernew Michael1

Affiliation:

1. University of Midcigan

Abstract

This article reviews twenty-four studies that compare health maintenance organization (HMO) use ofdiagnostic testing services tofee-for-service(FFS) use. Diagnosticservices contribute to both the high level and the growth of health care costs. This review of a series of studies is important because any single study is commonly limited to a small set of diagnostic tests and generally provides analysis restricted to one, or afew, HMOs. Combining evidence from each of the studies yields thefollowing conclusions. Relative to FFS enrollees, HMO enrollees receive fewer inpatient diagnostic tests. Evidence concerning HMO utilization of outpatient testing relative to FFS plans, though mixed, tends to suggest that HMOs do not perform more ofthese services and may performfewer for patients with chronic illnesses. Quality of care does not appear to suffer in HMOs despite lower testing rates, suggesting HMOs reduce testing in situations in which the incremental value is small.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Health Policy

Cited by 13 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Varied Differences in the Health Status Between Medicare Advantage and Fee-for-Service Enrollees;INQUIRY: The Journal of Health Care Organization, Provision, and Financing;2014-01-01

2. Adherence to K/DOQI Bone Metabolism Guidelines;Journal of Renal Nutrition;2009-07

3. Managed care and medical expenditures of Medicare beneficiaries;Journal of Health Economics;2008-12

4. Socioeconomic Disparities in Medical Provider Visits among Medicare Managed Care Enrollees;INQUIRY: The Journal of Health Care Organization, Provision, and Financing;2008-02

5. Medical interventions among pregnant women in fee-for-service and managed care insurance: a propensity score analysis;Applied Economics;2006-07-20

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3