Conceptual Framework for Integrating Family Caregivers Into the Health Care Team: A Scoping Review

Author:

Raj Minakshi1ORCID,Stephenson Amber L.2,DePuccio Matthew J.3,Sullivan Erin E.4,Tarver Will5,Fleuren Bram6,Thomas Samuel C.7,Scheck McAlearney Ann5

Affiliation:

1. University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, USA

2. Clarkson University, Schenectady, NY, USA

3. Rush University, Chicago, IL, USA

4. Suffolk University, Boston, MA, USA

5. The Ohio State University, Columbus, USA

6. Maastricht University, The Netherlands

7. Stanford School of Medicine and Intermountain Healthcare, USA

Abstract

More than 80% of family care partners of older adults are responsible for coordinating care between and among providers; yet, their inclusion in the health care delivery process lacks recognition, coordination, and standardization. Despite efforts to include care partners (e.g., through informal or formal proxy access to their care recipient’s patient portal), policies and procedures around care partner inclusion are complex and inconsistently implemented. We conducted a scoping review of peer-reviewed articles published from 2015 to 2021 and reviewed a final sample of 45 U.S.-based studies. Few articles specifically examine the inclusion of care partners in health care teams; those that do, do not define or measure care partner inclusion in a standardized way. Efforts to consider care partners as “partners” rather than “visitors” require further consideration of how to build health care teams inclusive of care partners. Incentives for health care organizations and providers to practice inclusive team-building may be required.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Health Policy

Reference98 articles.

1. AARP. (2015). Caregiving in the U.S. 2015. https://www.aarp.org/content/dam/aarp/ppi/2015/caregiving-in-the-us-appendix-b-detailed-methodology.pdf

2. AARP, & National Alliance for Caregiving. (2020). Caregiving in the United States 2020. https://www.aarp.org/content/dam/aarp/ppi/2020/05/full-report-caregiving-in-the-united-states.doi.10.26419-2Fppi.00103.001.pdf

3. Better Respiratory Education and Treatment Help Empower (BREATHE) study: Methodology and baseline characteristics of a randomized controlled trial testing a transitional care program to improve patient-centered care delivery among chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients

4. Minimally disruptive medicine (MDM) in clinical practice: a qualitative case study of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) clinic care model

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3