Efficacy of aprepitant in patients receiving high-dose chemotherapy with hematopoietic stem cell support

Author:

Paul Betsy1,Trovato James A2,Thompson Jennifer3,Badros Ashraf Z4,Goloubeva Olga5

Affiliation:

1. Department of Pharmacy Practice and Science, William Beaumont Hospital - Troy, 44201 Dequindre Road, Troy, MI 48085, USA,

2. University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, 20 North Pine Street, Room 448 Baltimore, MD 21201, USA

3. University of Maryland Medical Center, 22 South Greene Street, Room N11E02 Baltimore, MD 21201, USA

4. University of Maryland, Greenebaum Cancer Center, Bone Marrow Transplant Program, 22 South Greene Street, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA

5. Division of Biostatistics, University of Maryland Medical Center, 22 South Greene Street, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA

Abstract

Purpose. This study describes the efficacy of aprepitant in preventing nausea and vomiting associated with high-dose chemotherapy in hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) patients. Our hypothesis is the addition of aprepitant to 5-HT3 antagonists and dexamethasone would result in a 20% increase in complete response (CR) rates compared to CR rates from published studies evaluating antiemetic regimens without aprepitant. Methods. Adult HSCT patients receiving high-dose chemotherapy and aprepitant as part of their antiemetic regimen were included following written informed consent. CR was defined as no emesis, none to mild nausea, and no breakthrough antiemetic use. Daily patient diaries were used on days 1 through 7 following high-dose chemotherapy to collect severity of nausea, emetic episodes, breakthrough antiemetic use, and any antiemetic related side effects. Results. We accrued a total of 42 patients. CR rates ranged from 42.9% to 73.8% for the 7 days. The average CR rate for days 1 through 7 was 54%. Fourteen patients (33%) maintained a complete emetic response on each of the 7 days. The average CR rate for published studies in HSCT patients receiving an antiemetic regimen without aprepitant is 57%. Most common adverse effects reported by patients receiving aprepitant were hiccups (33%) and drowsiness (33%). Conclusions. The addition of aprepitant failed to meet our primary endpoint of increasing CR rates by 20%. The lower than expected CR rate was attributed to use of breakthrough antiemetics. Aprepitant did result in preventing emesis in the majority of patients and was associated with minimal side effects.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Pharmacology (medical),Oncology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3