Real-world treatment outcomes from nationwide Onco-colon Turkey registry in RAS wild-type patients treated with biologics second-line mCRC

Author:

Yildirim Mahmut Emre1ORCID,Karadurmuş Nuri2,Ökten İlker Nihat3,Türk Hacı Mehmet4,Urakçı Zuhat5ORCID,Arslan Çağatay6,Çelik Sinemis7,Dane Faysal8,Şendur Mehmet Ali Nahit9ORCID,Bilir Cemil10,Karabulut Bülent11,Cicin İrfan12ORCID,Çubukçu Erdem13ORCID,Karaca Mustafa14,Ozcelik Melike15ORCID,Artaç Mehmet16ORCID,Tanrikulu Eda17,Alacacioglu Ahmet18,Açıkgöz Özgür19,Öven Başak20,Geredeli Çağlayan21,Çil Timucin22,Harputluoğlu Hakan23,Kefeli Umut24ORCID,Bozkurt Oktay25,Tural Deniz26ORCID,Sakin Abdullah27ORCID,Yalçın Şuayip28,Gumus Mahmut29

Affiliation:

1. Medical Oncology Department, İstanbul Dr. Lütfi Kırdar Kartal City Hospital, Istanbu, Türkiye

2. Medical Oncology Department, Gulhane Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye

3. Medical Oncology Department, Medeniyet University Goztepe Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye

4. Department of Medical Oncology, Bezmialem Vakif University Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Türkiye

5. Department of Medical Oncology, Dicle University Medical Faculty, Diyarbakir, Türkiye

6. Medical Oncology, Bahcesehir Universitesi Tip Fakultesi, Istanbul, Türkiye

7. Medical Oncology Department, Istanbul Oncology Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye

8. Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Marmara University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Türkiye

9. Medical Oncology, Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Türkiye

10. Medical Oncology Department, Sakarya University Training and Research Hospital, Sakarya, Türkiye

11. Medical Oncology, Ege University Faculty of Medicine, Izmir, Türkiye

12. Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Oncology, Trakya University Faculty of Medicine, Edirne, Türkiye

13. Faculty of Medicine, Medical Oncology, Uludag University, Bursa, Türkiye

14. Medical Oncology Department, Antalya Training and Research Hospital, Antalya, Türkiye

15. Department of Oncology, Umraniye Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye

16. Department of Medical Oncology, Necmettin Erbakan University Medical Faculty, Konya, Türkiye

17. Medical Oncology, Istanbul Haydarpasa Numune Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye

18. Medical Oncology Department, Ministry of Health İzmir Katip Çelebi University Atatürk Education and Research Hospital, Izmir, Türkiye

19. Medical Oncology Department, Istanbul Medipol University, İstanbul, Türkiye

20. Medical Oncology Department, Yeditepe University Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye

21. Department of Medical Oncology, Okmeydani Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye

22. Department of Medical Oncology, University of Health Sciences, Adana City Education and Research Hospital, Adana, Türkiye

23. Medical Oncology Department, İnönü Üniversitesi, Malatya, Türkiye

24. Medical Oncology, Kocaeli University School of Medicine, Kocaeli, Türkiye

25. Medical Oncology Department, Erciyes Universitesi, Kayseri, Türkiye

26. Medical Oncology, Istanbul Bakirkoy Dr Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye

27. Department of Medical Oncology, Yuzuncu Yil University, Van, Türkiye

28. Department of Medical Oncology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Türkiye

29. Department of Medical Oncology, Istanbul Medeniyet University Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Türkiye

Abstract

Backgrounds and Objectives Colorectal cancer is one of the leading causes of mortality both globally and in our country. In Turkey, we conducted a multicenter investigation into the effectiveness of second-line treatments and real-life data for patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (NCT04757311). Materials and Methods In this retrospective analysis, records from 28 centers were collected, and histopathological, molecular, and clinical characteristics were documented. Patients were categorized into groups based on their second-line biological treatments: anti-EGFR (Group A and Group B, panitumumab and cetuximab) and anti-VEGF (Group C, bevacizumab and aflibercept). They were then compared within these groups. Results A total of 588 patients with documented RAS wild-type status were evaluated. The median OS was 15.7, 14.3 and 14.7 months in Group A, Group B and Group C, respectively ( p  =  0.764). The median PFS of the patients in second-line setting that received panitumumab, cetuximab and bevacizumab/aflibercept were 7.8, 6.6 and 7.4 months, respectively ( p  =  0.848). Conclusion According to the results of our real-life data study, there is no significant difference in efficiency between the combination of biological agent and chemotherapy used in the second-line treatments.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3