Unexpected deaths in cardiology outpatients – what can we learn from case review?

Author:

Kitz Thomas Michael1,Burnand Nikki2,Ortner Astrid1,Rudd Ian G3,Sampson Rod4,Rushworth Gordon F5,Leslie Stephen James26

Affiliation:

1. Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Graz, 8010 Graz, Austria

2. Cardiac Unit, Raigmore Hospital, Inverness IV2 3UJ, UK

3. NHS Highland, Inverness IV2 7GE, UK

4. Cairn Medical Practice, Inverness IV2 4AG, UK

5. Highland Pharmacy Education & Research Centre, Centre for Health Science, Inverness IV2 3JH, UK

6. Department of Diabetes & Cardiovascular Science, Centre for Health Science, University of the Highlands and Islands, Inverness IV2 3JH, UK

Abstract

Objectives A proportion of cardiac patients managed at a cardiology outpatient clinic will die between clinic visits. This study aimed to identify the cause of death, to determine if case review occurred and if a formal review of such cases might be useful. Design Single-centre retrospective cohort study. Setting A remote regional centre in the North of Scotland. Participants All patients who had been removed from the cardiology outpatient clinic due to death in the community. Main outcome measures Cause of death, comorbidities and treatments were collected from hospital records and the national register of deaths. Chi-squared test and Student’s t-test were used with significance taken at the 5% level. Results Of 10,606 patients who attended the cardiology outpatient clinic, 75 (0.7%) patients died in the community. The majority (57.0%) died from a non-cardiac cause. Eleven patients (14.9%) died due to an unexpected cardiac death. A detailed case note review was undertaken. In only two (18.2%) cases was any note made as to the cause of death in the hospital records and in only one was there details of post mortem discussion between primary and secondary care. Conclusions A small proportion of patients attending a cardiology outpatient clinic died in the community. Documentation of the death in the hospital notes was very poor and evidence of post mortem communication between primary and secondary care was absent in all but one case. Better documentation and communication between primary and secondary care would seem desirable.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3