Human milk products in the National Health Service: a cross-sectional survey of use and industry contact across England's trusts

Author:

Steele Sarah L.1234ORCID,Cooke Noah C.A.5

Affiliation:

1. Health and Social Care, University of Essex, Colchester, UK

2. Cambridge Public Health, Forvie Site, University of Cambridge, Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge, UK

3. St Edmund's College, Cambridge, UK

4. Department of Social and Political Sciences, Bocconi University, Milan, Italy

5. Hughes Hall, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK

Abstract

Summary Objectives Commentators and professional organisations note that an expanding market in human milk-based products (HMBPs) could reduce breastfeeding, compromising maternal and infant health, and undermine public milk bank donations. We investigate whether English NHS trusts purchased these products and whether HMBP companies have marketed to them. Design Freedom of Information (FOI) requests asking: (1) whether trusts obtained human milk; (2) if so, how; and (3) whether HMBP companies had approached them. We analysed trusts’ responses qualitatively. In 2023, an FOI request to the Food Standards Authority (FSA) following a product recall. Setting England. Participants One hundred and ninety-four NHS trusts, the FSA. Main Outcome Measures Obtaining human milk, approaches by companies, and trust responses to approaches. Results One hundred and seventy-six trusts responded, 102 reporting human milk from milk banks. No trusts reported purchasing from companies in 2022. In 2023, the FSA confirmed six English hospitals used HMBPs from one company; an FOI for trusts’ names was refused on law enforcement grounds. Two trusts reported participating in clinical trials funded by companies. Twenty-one reported approaches, using several strategies, including uninvited ward visits. Trusts rejected marketing based on guidance from: (1) trust dieticians or physicians; (2) regional regulatory bodies; (3) professional bodies; and (4) perceived application of an International Code on breastfeeding. Conclusions Companies market to trusts, adopting methods previously used by the formula industry. Trusts express confusion over whether this infringes agreements designed to promote breastfeeding. We encourage clarification and guidance for professionals and trusts to ensure safety, infant and maternal health, and protect public provision.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Reference30 articles.

1. A very lucrative liquid: the emerging trade in human milk as a form of reproductive exploitation and violence against women

2. Sibson V. Letter to NICE from Baby law feeding group – UK. 2021. Baby Law Feeding Group – UK, https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5c6bb04a65a70771b7cbc916/t/609d01462b17935c41869eb3/1620902215301/BFLG+letter+to+NICE+re+donor+milk+guidelines_12052021.pdf (2021, accessed 11 August 2022).

3. Nurture commodified? An investigation into commercial human milk supply chains

4. Markets, breastfeeding and trade in mothers’ milk

5. Bioscience P. Prolacta bioscience, https://www.prolacta.com/en/ (2022, accessed 18 August 2022).

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3