Affiliation:
1. The University of Law, UK
2. University of York, UK
Abstract
This article considers whether degree apprenticeships could disrupt traditional university routes to professional careers and redress longstanding inequalities in access between individuals from different social backgrounds. Using the solicitors’ profession as a pertinent case, issues of access and choice are explored, utilising Breen and Goldthorpe’s theory of Relative Risk Aversion to understand variation across social background. Drawing on 23 in-depth interviews with law students, trainee solicitors and solicitor degree apprentices from four universities and five law firms across England, the analysis illuminates the decision-making approaches of aspiring solicitors through both the university and the degree apprenticeship routes. Contrary to expectation, the degree apprenticeship route appears to be discounted as unfamiliar and risky by many of those from disadvantaged backgrounds. Instead, it is tactically adopted as an alternative by some middle-class students. As such, the degree apprenticeship is not likely to disrupt existing patterns of access to the solicitors’ profession.
Subject
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Economics and Econometrics,Sociology and Political Science,Accounting
Reference33 articles.
1. The Reconstructed Professional Firm: Explaining Change in English Legal Practices
2. Ashley L, Sommerlad H, Duberley J (2015) Barriers to social exclusion is rife in elite professions in the UK. LSE Blogs, 5 August. Available at: https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpolicy/barriers-to-entry-social-exclusion-is-rife-in-elite-professions/ (accessed 12 November 2015).
3. Forward and backward, horizontal and vertical: Transformation of occupational credentialing in the schooled society
4. How fair is access to more prestigious UK universities?
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献