The use and abuse of journal quality lists-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

The use and abuse of journal quality lists

Published:2011-07 Issue:4 Volume:18 Page:443-446
ISSN:1350-5084
Container-title:Organization
language:en
Short-container-title:Organization

Author:

Rowlinson Michael¹,Harvey Charles²,Kelly Aidan³,Morris Huw⁴

Affiliation:

1. Queen Mary University of London,

2. University of Strathclyde

3. Goldsmiths University of London

4. University of Salford

Abstract

The ABS list is one of the most widely used journal quality lists available. It is pluralistic and comprehensive, and is widely seen as capturing the consensus in relation to journal ratings. As editors of the ABS list we are concerned at recent calls for a moratorium, or even the abolition of journal quality lists. These calls reinforce the elitist view that the tacit knowledge of where to publish should not be made explicit in lists.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation,Strategy and Management,General Business, Management and Accounting

Link

http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1350508411403534

Reference4 articles.

1. Harvey, C., Kelly, A. , Morris, H. and Rowlinson, M. eds. (2010) The Association of Business Schools Academic Journal Quality Guide Version 4.

2. Mingers, J., Watson, K. and Scaparra, P. ( 2009) ‘Estimating Business and Management Journal Quality from the 2008 Research Assessment Exercise in the UK’, Kent Business School Working Paper Series, 205.

Cited by 31 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. A meta-analysis of sustainable supply chain practices and performance: the moderating roles of type of economy and innovation;International Journal of Operations & Production Management;2023-01-12

2. MUST HAVE OR NICE TO HAVE? NECESSARY LEADERSHIP COMPETENCIES TO ENABLE EMPLOYEES’ INNOVATIVE BEHAVIOUR;International Journal of Innovation Management;2022-12

3. Vertical, horizontal, and self control in academia: Survey evidence on their diverging effects on perceived researcher autonomy and identity;The British Accounting Review;2021-10

4. Consumer cosmopolitanism in international marketing research: a systematic review and future research agenda;International Marketing Review;2021-08-10

5. Does the Financial Times FT50 journal list select the best management and economics journals?;Scientometrics;2021-05-17