Forbear is a Homophone: Lexical Prosody Does Not Constrain Lexical Access

Abstract

Because stress can occur in any position within an English word, lexical prosody could serve as a minimal distinguishing feature between pairs of words. However, most pairs of English words with stress pattern opposition also differ vocalically: OBject and obJECT, CONtent and conTENT have different vowels in their first syllables as well as different stress patterns. To test whether prosodic information is made use of in auditory word recognition independently of segmental phonetic information, it is necessary to examine pairs like FORbear — forBEAR or TRUSty — trusTEE, semantically unrelated words which exhibit stress pattern opposition but no segmental difference. In a cross-modal priming task, such words produce the priming effects characteristic of homophones, indicating that lexical prosody is not used in the same way as segmental structure to constrain lexical access.