Scarred survivors: gate keepers and gate openers to healthcare for migrants in vulnerable circumstances

Author:

Clark Emily1ORCID,Steel Nicholas2ORCID,Gillam Tara B3ORCID,Sharman Monica4ORCID,Webb Anne5ORCID,Bucataru Ana-Maria6ORCID,Hanson Sarah7ORCID

Affiliation:

1. GP and Honorary Research Fellow, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK

2. Professor of Public Health, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK

3. Academic Public Health Trainee, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK

4. Foundation Doctor, Yorkshire and the Humber Postgraduate Deanery

5. Community Volunteer, Postdoctoral Researcher, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK

6. Specialist Nurse, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK

7. Lecturer in Health Sciences, School of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK

Abstract

Background The main barriers to ‘vulnerable migrants’ receiving good quality primary care are language and administration barriers. Little is known about the experiences of healthcare discrimination faced by migrants from different cultural groups. The aim was to explore vulnerable migrants’ perspectives on primary healthcare in a UK city. Methods Three focus groups and two semi-structured interviews were aided by interpreters. These were analysed against a pre-developed framework based on national standards of care for vulnerable migrants. Recruitment was facilitated via a community organisation. Results In total, 13 participants took part, six women and seven men. There were five Arabic speakers, four Farsi speakers and four English speakers. Themes included access to primary care, mental health, use of interpreters, post-migration stressors and cultural competency. Conclusion Vulnerable migrants perceived high levels of discrimination and reported the value of a respectful attitude from health professionals. Appointment booking systems and re-ordering medication are key areas where language barriers cause the most disruption to patient care. Medication-only treatment plans have limitations for mental distress for this population. Community-based therapies which manage post-migration stressors are likely to enhance recovery.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Research and Theory

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3