Development of the Scientific Research Competency Scale for nurses

Author:

Duru Pınar1ORCID,Örsal Özlem2

Affiliation:

1. Assistant Professor Doctor, Department of Public Health Nursing, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Turkey

2. Professor Doctor, Department of Public Health Nursing, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Turkey

Abstract

Background The planning, implementation, finalisation and reporting of high-quality research depends on the knowledge, skills and competencies of the many individuals who make carrying out the research possible. Aims This study aims to develop a valid and reliable scale in order to identify the scientific research competencies of nursing professionals at undergraduate and graduate level. Methods This methodological study was carried out on 937 nursing personnel, 422 (45%) of whom were academic members and 515 (55%) were undergraduate students. The Anxiety Scale Towards Research and the Attitude Scale Towards Scientific Research were used for the criterion validity. Results The Scientific Research Competency Scale comprises 57 items in four sub-dimensions named as ‘technical skills’, ‘attitude and behaviours’, ‘estimation capacity’ and ‘foreign language skill’. The Cronbach alpha, Guttmann split-half and Spearman Brown reliability coefficients for the scientific research competency scale were, respectively, 0.98, 0.96 and 0.96. The sensitivity and specificity value, by which the research competency of individuals could be determined with minimum error, was indicated to be at 190 breakpoints of the scientific research competency scale. Conclusions As a result, the scientific research competency scale developed is a valid and reliable tool that can be used to determine the scientific research competencies of nursing professionals.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Research and Theory

Reference38 articles.

1. Amano T, GonzaÂlez-Varo J P and Sutherland WJ (2016) Languages are still a major barrier to global science. Plos Biol 14(12): 1–8.

2. AACN (American Association of Colleges of Nursing) (2006). AACN: Position statement on nursing research. Washington, DC: American Association of Colleges of Nursing. http://www.aacnnursing.org/Portals/42/News/Position-Statements/Nursing-Research.pdf (accessed 17 May 2021).

3. Barriers that prevent implementation of research findings in nursing: Education‐research hospitals case

4. Beirne D, Boase S, Croudass A, et al. (2011) Competency framework for clinical research nurses: a tool to promote patient safety and quality data. Competency Framework Working Group: Research Nurse Comptency Framework Version. University of Surrey. Surrey Research Insight. http://epubs.surrey.ac.uk/825621/ (accessed 17 May 2021).

5. Bakioğlu A and Kurnaz Ö (2014) Quality in research, 3rd edn. Ankara, Turkey: Nobel Academy. (Original work published in Turkish).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3