Affiliation:
1. Assistant Professor Doctor, Department of Public Health Nursing, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Turkey
2. Professor Doctor, Department of Public Health Nursing, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Turkey
Abstract
Background The planning, implementation, finalisation and reporting of high-quality research depends on the knowledge, skills and competencies of the many individuals who make carrying out the research possible. Aims This study aims to develop a valid and reliable scale in order to identify the scientific research competencies of nursing professionals at undergraduate and graduate level. Methods This methodological study was carried out on 937 nursing personnel, 422 (45%) of whom were academic members and 515 (55%) were undergraduate students. The Anxiety Scale Towards Research and the Attitude Scale Towards Scientific Research were used for the criterion validity. Results The Scientific Research Competency Scale comprises 57 items in four sub-dimensions named as ‘technical skills’, ‘attitude and behaviours’, ‘estimation capacity’ and ‘foreign language skill’. The Cronbach alpha, Guttmann split-half and Spearman Brown reliability coefficients for the scientific research competency scale were, respectively, 0.98, 0.96 and 0.96. The sensitivity and specificity value, by which the research competency of individuals could be determined with minimum error, was indicated to be at 190 breakpoints of the scientific research competency scale. Conclusions As a result, the scientific research competency scale developed is a valid and reliable tool that can be used to determine the scientific research competencies of nursing professionals.
Reference38 articles.
1. Amano T, GonzaÂlez-Varo J P and Sutherland WJ (2016) Languages are still a major barrier to global science. Plos Biol 14(12): 1–8.
2. AACN (American Association of Colleges of Nursing) (2006). AACN: Position statement on nursing research. Washington, DC: American Association of Colleges of Nursing. http://www.aacnnursing.org/Portals/42/News/Position-Statements/Nursing-Research.pdf (accessed 17 May 2021).
3. Barriers that prevent implementation of research findings in nursing: Education‐research hospitals case
4. Beirne D, Boase S, Croudass A, et al. (2011) Competency framework for clinical research nurses: a tool to promote patient safety and quality data. Competency Framework Working Group: Research Nurse Comptency Framework Version. University of Surrey. Surrey Research Insight. http://epubs.surrey.ac.uk/825621/ (accessed 17 May 2021).
5. Bakioğlu A and Kurnaz Ö (2014) Quality in research, 3rd edn. Ankara, Turkey: Nobel Academy. (Original work published in Turkish).
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献