Governing body nurses’ experiences of clinical commissioning groups: an observational study of two clinical commissioning groups in England

Author:

Allan Helen T1,Dixon Roz2,Lee Gay3,Savage Jan4,Tapson Christine5

Affiliation:

1. Professor of Nursing, Centre for Critical Research in Nursing & Midwifery, School of Health & Education, Middlesex University, London, UK

2. Senior Lecturer, Department of Psychological Sciences, Birkbeck, London University, London, UK

3. Clinical Nurse, UK

4. Researcher, UK

5. Research fellow, Centre for Critical Research in Nursing & Midwifery, School of Health & Education, Middlesex University, London, UK

Abstract

Clinical commissioning groups were set up under the Health & Social Care Act (2012) in England to commission healthcare services for local communities. Governing body nurses provide nursing leadership to commissioning services on clinical commissioning groups. Little is known about how nurses function on clinical commissioning groups. We conducted observations of seven formal meetings, three informal observation sessions and seven interviews from January 2015 to July 2015 in two clinical commissioning groups in the South of England. Implicit in the governing body nurse role is the enduring and contested assumption that nurses embody the values of caring, perception and compassion. This assumption undermines the authority of nurses in multidisciplinary teams where authority is traditionally clinically based. Emerging roles within clinical commissioning groups are not based on clinical expertise, but on well-established new public management concepts which promote governance over clinically-based authority. While governing body nurses claim an authority located in clinical and managerial expertise, this is contested by members of the clinical commissioning group and external stakeholders irrespective of whether it is aligned with clinical knowledge and practice or with new forms of management, as both disregard the type of expertise nurses in commissioning embody.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Research and Theory

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3