Nursing research ethics

Author:

Glenister David1

Affiliation:

1. Research and Development Unit, Anglia Polytechnic University, Essex

Abstract

Uncertainty exists in the strategies adopted to ensure nursing research is ethical. Currently available codes and guidelines demonstrate some limitations. Local research ethics committees (LRECs) appear to be medically dominated, biased against nursing research, uncertain of the criteria by which they make judgements and, in some cases, harmful to those who make submissions. There is some evidence of a lack of equity in the treatment of nursing research and of research methods. Two strategies adopted to scrutinise nursing research are explored: nursing research ethics committees in higher education and in health service settings (trusts or hospitals). The limitations of these strategies in tackling the basic problems of LRECs are indicated, and alternatives are discussed. [ NT Research 1996; 1: 3, 184-190]

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Research and Theory

Reference27 articles.

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3