Operationalising a modified Delphi study to progress quality care process nursing metrics for acute care

Author:

O’Connor Laserina1ORCID,McAuliffe Eilish2,Casey Mary3,Rogers Lisa4ORCID,Gallen Anne5,Finnegan Leonie6,Glasgow Mary Ellen7,White Mark8,White Ciara9,Kavanagh Paula6,Bell Miriam6,Killeen Angela6,Barnard Marlize10

Affiliation:

1. Professor, UCD School of Nursing Midwifery & Health Systems, University College Dublin, Ireland

2. Full Professor, UCD School of Nursing Midwifery & Health Systems, University College Dublin, Ireland

3. Associate Professor, UCD School of Nursing Midwifery & Health Systems, University College Dublin, Ireland

4. Lecturer, UCD School of Nursing Midwifery & Health Systems, University College Dublin, Ireland

5. Director, Nursing & Midwifery Planning Development Unit, Health Service Executive, Ireland

6. Quality Care Metrics Project Officer, Nursing & Midwifery Planning Development Unit, Health Service Executive, Ireland

7. Professor and Dean, School of Nursing, Duquesne University, USA.

8. Vice-President, Department of Nursing, Waterford Institute of Technology, Ireland

9. Assistant Lecturer, School of Nursing, Psychotherapy, and Community Health, Dublin City University, Ireland.

10. Research Assistant, UCD School of Nursing Midwifery & Health Systems, University College Dublin, Ireland

Abstract

Background Despite representing the largest occupational group within the healthcare workforce, evidence suggests that due to the complexity of nursing practice, nurses’ contribution remains ‘invisible’. Quality Care Metrics aligned to standards can offer valuable numerical information that quantify input, output and dimensions of nursing care processes in complex clinical and interprofessional milieus. Aims and objectives Progress an evidence-based metric system to measure the quality and clinical safety of nursing care within acute care in Ireland. The objectives were to: classify quality care process nursing metrics and corresponding indicators pertinent to acute care; reach agreement on a selected set of robust metrics and corresponding indicators; and implement the findings of the study. Design A modified four-round Delphi study. Methods The modified Delphi study integrated a four-round survey of 422 nurses, face-to-face meetings with a patient representative and key stakeholders within acute services with a final consensus meeting inclusive of a panel of 26 expert nurse clinicians. Results There was consensus on 11 quality care process nursing metrics and 53 corresponding indicators for the acute care setting. Despite the rating of ‘critical’ in the Delphi rounds, a concern was reported by participants on the subjective nature of three of the developed metrics: ‘patient experience’, ‘patient engagement’ and ‘professional and ethical approach to care’ based on the absence of objective measurement tools that include patient input. Conversely, this led to the conundrum for the panel of experts at the final consensus meeting who were divided in their views on objectively observing, recording and subsequent auditing of those three developed metrics in real-time clinical practice. Conclusion This paper describes the operationalisation of a modified Delphi technique that progressed a set of 11 quality care process metrics and 53 corresponding indicators. The challenge now is the implementation of these quality care process metrics so that nurses’ contribution to patient-centred care is tangible in acute care.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Research and Theory

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3