Nurses’ assessment of the ethical climate of a university hospital in the South of Brazil

Author:

Carpes Lanes Taís1ORCID,de Lima Dalmolin Graziele2,Maciel da Silva Augusto3,Costa Schutz Thaís4,Bosi de Souza Magnago Tânia Solange5,Andolhe Rafaela2

Affiliation:

1. PhD Student in Nursing, Federal University of Santa Maria, Santa Maria, RS-Brazil

2. Professor of the Department of Nursing, Federal University of Santa Maria, Santa Maria, RS-Brazil

3. Professor of the Department of Statistics Federal University of Santa Maria, Santa Maria, RS-Brazil

4. Master’s Student in Nursing Federal University of Santa Maria, Santa Maria, RS-Brazil

5. Professor of the Department of Nursing, Federal University of Santa Maria, Santa Maria, RS- Brazil

Abstract

Background: Ethical climate can be defined as the healthcare professionals’ perceptions of the ethical treatment of healthcare issues and human interactions in their work environment. A number of studies on ethical climate are being carried out in several countries. In Brazil, however, research on the matter is still incipient, especially among hospital nurses. Aim: To assess nurses’ perception of the ethical climate in a university hospital in the South of Brazil. Methods: Cross-sectional study carried out with 269 nurses from a university hospital, using a sociodemographic and occupational profiling survey and the Hospital Ethical Climate Survey – Brazilian version. Data analysis was done through descriptive statistics. Results: The nurses’ perception of the ethical climate was positive (3.68 ± 0.55). Among the five assessment factors, ‘peers’ had the highest score (4.07 ± 0.57), whereas ‘physicians’ had the lowest score (3.26 ± 0.70) for ethical climate. Conclusion: In general, the ethical climate was perceived as positive, with small variations between the factors of the instrument. Ethical climate could be enhanced through strategies that encourage interpersonal relationships. This study shows the importance of a positive ethical climate based on good relationships between healthcare professionals for ensuring better care.

Funder

National Council for Scientific and Technological Development, Universal Notice

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Research and Theory

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3