Affiliation:
1. Department of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
2. School of Pharmaceutical Science, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
3. Department of Pharmacy, Dermatology Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
4. Department of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, No. 58, Zhong Shan Er Lu, Guangzhou 510080, China
Abstract
Background: Frequent failures observed in some trials comparing the efficacy and safety of osimertinib plus bevacizumab to osimertinib monotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) alterations have brought questions. Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of these two treatment regimens in advanced NSCLC patients harboring EGFR mutations. Design: This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis. Data sources and methods: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang, and VIP databases were extensively searched for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on 14 May 2023. Two researchers independently screened the literature, assessed quality, and extracted data. The primary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and objective response rate (ORR). The secondary outcomes were adverse events (AEs) and PFS stratified by patients’ characteristics. STATA 17.0 software (StataCorp LLC, USA) was adopted for meta-analysis. Results: A total of four RCTs involving 390 patients were included. Overall, the risk of bias across the studies was moderate to low. Pooled results showed that compared to osimertinib alone, the addition of bevacizumab to osimertinib failed to show prolongation of PFS [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.00, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.78–1.27], OS (HR = 1.01, 95% CI: 0.73–1.41), or improvement of the ORR (risk ratio = 1.12, 95% CI: 0.90–1.38), while an increased incidence of some AEs was observed, such as nausea, oral mucositis, hypertension, and proteinuria. Notably, combination treatment did significantly prolong the PFS in the subset of smokers (HR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.44–0.94). A mild trend toward PFS benefit under the combined regimen was also noted in patients with brain metastases and first-line treatment, though not reaching statistical significance. Conclusion: Based on the available evidence, the addition of bevacizumab to osimertinib could not provide additional survival benefits with higher but manageable toxicity for EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients. Osimertinib monotherapy remains the prioritized treatment. Further investigation is warranted.
Funder
Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of Guangdong Province
Wu Jieping Medical Foundation