Comparison of osimertinib plus bevacizumab against osimertinib alone in NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Author:

Zhou Guojin12ORCID,Guo Liuxian12,Xu Jing3,Tang Kejing1,Chen Jie4ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China

2. School of Pharmaceutical Science, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China

3. Department of Pharmacy, Dermatology Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China

4. Department of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, No. 58, Zhong Shan Er Lu, Guangzhou 510080, China

Abstract

Background: Frequent failures observed in some trials comparing the efficacy and safety of osimertinib plus bevacizumab to osimertinib monotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) alterations have brought questions. Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of these two treatment regimens in advanced NSCLC patients harboring EGFR mutations. Design: This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis. Data sources and methods: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang, and VIP databases were extensively searched for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on 14 May 2023. Two researchers independently screened the literature, assessed quality, and extracted data. The primary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and objective response rate (ORR). The secondary outcomes were adverse events (AEs) and PFS stratified by patients’ characteristics. STATA 17.0 software (StataCorp LLC, USA) was adopted for meta-analysis. Results: A total of four RCTs involving 390 patients were included. Overall, the risk of bias across the studies was moderate to low. Pooled results showed that compared to osimertinib alone, the addition of bevacizumab to osimertinib failed to show prolongation of PFS [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.00, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.78–1.27], OS (HR = 1.01, 95% CI: 0.73–1.41), or improvement of the ORR (risk ratio = 1.12, 95% CI: 0.90–1.38), while an increased incidence of some AEs was observed, such as nausea, oral mucositis, hypertension, and proteinuria. Notably, combination treatment did significantly prolong the PFS in the subset of smokers (HR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.44–0.94). A mild trend toward PFS benefit under the combined regimen was also noted in patients with brain metastases and first-line treatment, though not reaching statistical significance. Conclusion: Based on the available evidence, the addition of bevacizumab to osimertinib could not provide additional survival benefits with higher but manageable toxicity for EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients. Osimertinib monotherapy remains the prioritized treatment. Further investigation is warranted.

Funder

Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of Guangdong Province

Wu Jieping Medical Foundation

Publisher

SAGE Publications

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3