A randomized, multicenter phase II study comparing efficacy, safety and tolerability of two dosing regimens of cisplatin and pemetrexed in patients with advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer

Author:

Metzenmacher Martin12,Kopp Hans-Georg345,Griesinger Frank6,Reinmuth Niels78,Sebastian Martin9,Serke Monika10,Waller Cornelius Florian11,Thomas Michael12,Eggert Jochen13,Schmid-Bindert Gerald14,Hoiczyk Mathias15,Christoph Daniel Christian15,Kimmich Martin316,Deuß Burkhard17,Seifert Stephanie17,Held Swantje17,Schuler Martin11819,Herold Thomas20,Breitenbuecher Frank15,Eberhardt Wilfried Ernst Erich212

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany

2. Division of Thoracic Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Medicine Essen – Ruhrlandklinik, Essen, Germany

3. Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany

4. Department of Molecular and Thoracic Oncology, Robert Bosch Cancer Center Stuttgart, Klinik Schillerhoehe, Stuttgart, Germany

5. Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany

6. Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Pius-Hospital Oldenburg, University Medicine Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany

7. Department of Oncology, Department of Pulmonology, LungenClinic Grosshansdorf, Grosshansdorf, Germany

8. Department of Medical Oncology, Asklepios Hospital Munich-Gauting, Munich, Germany

9. Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany

10. Department of Pulmonology, Lungenklinik Hemer, Hemer, Germany

11. Department of Medicine I, University Medical Center Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany

12. Department of Thoracic Oncology, Thoraxklinik, University Hospital Heidelberg and Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC-H), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Heidelberg, Germany

13. Practice of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Onkologische Praxis Moers, Moers, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany

14. Medical Faculty Mannheim, University Heidelberg

15. Department of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany

16. Department of Molecular and Thoracic Oncology, Robert Bosch Cancer Center Stuttgart, Klinik Schillerhoehe, Stuttgart, Baden-Württemberg, Germany

17. ClinAssess GmbH, Clinical Research Organisation (CRO), Leverkusen, Germany

18. Division of Thoracic Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Medicine Essen – Ruhrlandklinik, Essen, NRW, Germany

19. German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany

20. Department of Pathology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany

21. Department of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, Essen, Nordrhein-Westfalen, 45147, Germany

Abstract

Background: Pemetrexed and cisplatin is a first-line standard in non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer without targetable mutations. It became the backbone of checkpoint-inhibitor–chemotherapy combinations. Single high doses of cisplatin pose toxicity risks and require hyperhydration, potentially prolonging outpatient application. The aim of this study was to compare efficacy, safety and tolerability of split-dose cisplatin with the standard schedule. Methods: Patients with metastatic non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer were randomly assigned to up to six 21-day cycles of pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 and cisplatin 75 mg/m2 on day 1 (arm A), or pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 (day 1) and cisplatin 40 mg/m2 (day 1 + 8, arm B), followed by pemetrexed maintenance. Primary endpoint was objective response rate. Secondary objectives were overall survival, progression-free survival, time to progression, treatment compliance, toxicity profile, and quality of life. Results: We enrolled 130 patients (129 evaluable). Median cycle numbers in A and B were six (1–6) and five (1–6). Dose intensities were comparable between arms. More patients in A received pemetrexed maintenance (24.2% versus 11.1%). With 16 (24.2%) in A and 19 (30.2%) patients in B achieving objective responses [odds ratio 0.74 (0.34–1.62), p = 0.55] the primary endpoint was met. Overall survival was not different between arms (median 14.4 versus 14.9 months); [HR = 1.07; (0.68–1.68), p = 0.78]. Median progression-free survival was 7.0 months in A and 6.2 months in B [HR = 1.63; (1.17–2.38); p = 0.01]. Adverse events of CTCAE grade ⩾3, particularly hematological, were more frequent in B. No difference in grade 4 and 5 infections between arms was noted. Treatment-related asthenia and nausea/vomiting of any grade were more frequent in A. Global health status, fatigue and constipation measured on day 1 of cycle 4 demonstrated superior scores in B. Conclusion: Pemetrexed and split-dose cisplatin is safe and effective. Advantages of split-dose cisplatin with regard to specific toxicities allow personalization of this important chemotherapy backbone. Trial Registration: European Clinical Trials Database (EudraCT) number 2011-001963-37.

Funder

eli lilly and company

Duisburg-Essen

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Oncology

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3