Immunohistochemical markers to diagnose primary squamous cell carcinoma of the lung: a meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy

Author:

Chen Hao1ORCID,Katakura Seigo2ORCID,Horita Nobuyuki3ORCID,Namkoong Ho4,Kato Ikuma5,Hara Yu2,Kobayashi Nobuaki2ORCID,Fujii Satoshi5,Kaneko Takeshi2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Pulmonology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, JapanDepartment of Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Teikyo University, Tokyo, Japan

2. Department of Pulmonology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan

3. Department of Pulmonology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-9 Fukuura, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama 236-0004, Japan

4. Department of Infectious Diseases, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan

5. Department of Molecular Pathology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan

Abstract

Background: Inconsistent diagnostic test accuracies of immunohistological staining for squamous cell carcinoma (SQC) of the lung have been frequently reported. There have been few meta-analyses of the diagnostic accuracies of the immunohistochemical markers. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed following standard guidelines for systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy. Immunohistochemical markers (p40, p63, CK5/6, and DSC3) were evaluated as index tests for SQC. The diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was obtained by the DerSimonian–Laird variate model. Summary estimates of sensitivity and specificity were calculated using a bivariate model. The protocol registration ID is UMIN000041664. Results: The meta-analysis included 85 of the 1353 first-screened articles. The total number of patients was 17,893, which consisted 6151 SQC cases and 11,742 non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer cases. The DOR was better for p40 (377, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 213–644, I2 = 0%) than for CK5/6 (120, 95% CI = 78–184, I2 = 2.5%), p63 (70, 95% CI = 55–88, I2 = 9.1%), and DSC3 (94, 95% CI = 35–250, I2 = 3.7%). Summary estimates of sensitivity and specificity were followings: p40 sensitivity 0.92 (95% CI = 0.89–0.95), specificity 0.94 (95% CI = 0.93–0.96); p63 sensitivity 0.92 (95% CI = 0.90–0.94), specificity 0.83 (95% CI = 0.80–0.86); CK5/6 sensitivity 0.90 (95% CI = 0.87–0.93), specificity 0.91 (95% CI = 0.89–0.93); DSC3 sensitivity 0.81 (95% CI = 0.73–0.88), and specificity 0.95 (95% CI = 0.85–0.98). Conclusion: P40 had the best DOR to diagnose SQC in non-small-cell lung carcinoma. Despite its lower sensitivity, DSC3 had the best specificity among the four markers and might be useful to rule-in the diagnosis of SQC.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Oncology

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3