Real-world dose reduction of standard and modified FOLFIRINOX in metastatic pancreatic cancer: a systematic review, evidence-mapping, and meta-analysis

Author:

Jung Kwangrok1,Choi Suhyun1,Song Hyunjoo2,Kwak Kyuhan2,Anh Soyeon3,Jung Jae Hyup1,Kim Bomi1,Ahn Jinwoo1,Kim Jaihwan14,Hwang Jin-Hyeok14,Lee Jong-chan54ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea

2. School of Computer Science and Engineering, Soongsil University, Seoul, Korea

3. Division of Statistics, Medical Research Collaborating Center, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea

4. College of Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea

5. Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 82, Gumi-ro 173 Beon-gil, Bundang-gu, Seongnam, Gyeonggi-do 13620, Korea

Abstract

Background: FOLFIRINOX, used in metastatic pancreatic cancer (MPC), is highly efficacious but also toxic. Various dose modifications for FOLFIRINOX have been introduced to reduce toxicity. However, these studies lack a unified pattern for ‘planned’ dose modification, and the ‘actually administered’ dose varied more. Objective: To map a 10-year trend for ‘planned’ and ‘actual’ doses of FOLFIRINOX and investigate the clinical outcomes according to dose modification. Data sources and methods: A comprehensive systematic literature search was conducted from January 2011 to September 2021. All studies for FOLFIRINOX as first-line treatment in MPC were considered. Selected studies were firstly classified according to prospective versus retrospective research, secondly standard versus modified FOLFIRINOX, and thirdly ‘planned’ versus ‘actual’ dose. For evidence-mapping for the trend of dose modification, we developed a web-based interactive bubble-plot program ( www.RDI-map.com ). Objective response rate (ORR) and hematologic toxicity were set as endpoints for the comparison of clinical outcomes according to dose modification. Results: A total of 37 studies were identified for evidence-mapping (11 prospective and 26 retrospective studies). There were 12 different types of ‘planned’ dose modification in FOLFIRINOX ranging 75–100% oxaliplatin, 75–100% irinotecan, 0–100% 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) bolus, and 75–133% 5-FU continuous injection. The ‘actual’ dose further decreased to 54–96%, 61–88%, 0–92%, and 63–98%, respectively. For the standard versus modified FOLFIRINOX, the ORR was 28.2% (95% CI: 22.5–33.9%) and 33.8% (95% CI: 30.3–37.3%), respectively ( p = 0.100), and the incidence of febrile neutropenia was 11.6% (95% CI: 0–16.0%) and 5.5% (95% CI: 0–8.9%), respectively ( p = 0.030). Conclusions: RDI-map.com enables multifactorial evidence-mapping for practical FOLFIRINOX dose reduction. The pattern of dose modification was not consistent across studies, and there was a significant gap between the ‘planned’ and ‘actual’ doses. Modified FOLFIRINOX showed similar efficacy to the standard regimen with reduced incidence of febrile neutropenia.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Oncology

Reference53 articles.

1. Cancer Statistics, 2021

2. Estimated Projection of US Cancer Incidence and Death to 2040

3. FOLFIRINOX versus Gemcitabine for Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer

4. Increased Survival in Pancreatic Cancer with nab-Paclitaxel plus Gemcitabine

5. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: pancreatic adenocarcinoma. V.1.2022. https://www.nccn.org/ (2022, accessed 22 March 2022).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3