Affiliation:
1. The Graduate Center–City University of New York, New York, NY, USA
Abstract
The growing housing affordability crisis is at the center of conversations about U.S. inequality. This paper reconsiders the role of rent stabilization as one important affordability tool. We investigate who is most likely to benefit from rent stabilization, how much non-stabilized renters would save if their units were stabilized, and the extent to which stabilization would reduce rent burden among households. Using New York City Housing Vacancy Survey data and employing logistic and hedonic regression techniques, we show that Hispanic and foreign-born householders are more likely to live in rent-stabilized units and find evidence of both rent savings and rent burden reduction when comparing stabilized tenants with their non-stabilized counterparts. We argue that expanded rent stabilization could be paired with policies that stimulate new construction to simultaneously curb rent inflation, protect current populations from displacement, and increase housing supply.
Reference77 articles.
1. Chapter 24 Economic theory and housing
2. Time for Revisionism on Rent Control?
3. ATTOM. 2021. “Owning a Home More Affordable than Renting in Nearly Two Thirds of U.S. Housing Markets.” ATTOM, January 7. Retrieved August 30, 2022 (https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/owning-a-home-more-affordable-than-renting-in-nearly-two-thirds-of-us-housing-markets-301201921.html).
4. The economic effects of long-term rent control: The case of New York City
5. Housing Market Spillovers: Evidence from the End of Rent Control in Cambridge, Massachusetts
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献