Affiliation:
1. Alliant International University
Abstract
By statute, in California (and in many other states) if at the time of trial a defendant’s mental competence is called into question, efforts must be made to render that individual competent before proceeding. If such efforts fail, the person is absolved of criminal responsibility. In light of this legal mandate, the Porterville (California) Developmental Center created its Court Competency Training Program. The present study was a limited evaluation of the Porterville program and involved developmentally delayed criminal defendants rather than those who are mentally ill. Results showed that individuals who were adjudged as incompetent to stand trial due to developmental disability and enrolled for 6 months in the training program demonstrated significant gain in Competency Assessment Instrument (CAI) score. The same gain was not evidenced by developmentally delayed Porterville residents who were not criminal defendants and not enrolled in the training program. Although the results were based on a small sample size, they do suggest that additional research with the CAI and developmentally delayed criminal defendants would be fruitful.
Reference16 articles.
1. Criminal-justice-related competencies in defendants with mental retardation
2. Bittman, B. J. & Convit, A. (1993). Competency, civil commitment, and the dangerousness of the mentally ill. Journal of Forensic Sci, 38(6), 1460-1466.
3. An analysis of competency to stand trial: an integration of case law and clinical knowledge
4. Everington, C. & Luckasson, R. (1989). Addressing the needs of the criminal defendant with mental retardation: The special educator as a resource to the criminal justice system. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 24(3), 193-200.
5. Forness, S. R. & Kavale, K. A. (1993). Strategies to improve basic learning and memory deficits in mental retardation: A meta-analysis of experimental studies. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 28(2), 99-110.