Affiliation:
1. University of Alabama in Huntsville
2. University of North Alabama, Florence,
Abstract
This study examined both Democratic and Republican state and national party platforms in the law and justice policy domain. By using content analysis to establish the ideological position of state and national parties, this article seeks to determine predictors of party preferences and party unity in this critical area of public policy. Results indicate that national party committees tend to take moderate positions on law and justice policy issues, whereas their state counterparts tend to be more conservative and liberal within Republican and Democratic committees, respectively. This article also found variation within predictors of party unity.
Reference40 articles.
1. Why Parties?
2. Exploring the "Missing Link": Political Culture as an Explanation of the Occupational Status and Diversity of State Legislators in Thirty States
3. Bibby, J.F. & Holbrook, T.M. (2003). Parties and elections. In V. Gray & H. Jacob (Eds.), Politics in the American states: A comparative analysis (8th ed., pp. 62-99). Washington, DC: CQ Press.
4. Party Platforms in State Politics
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献