Remote consultations in primary care across low-, middle- and high-income countries: Implications for policy and care delivery

Author:

Williams Siân1,Barnard Amanda2,Collis Phil3,Correia de Sousa Jaime4ORCID,Ghimire Suraj5,Habib Monsur6,Jelen Tessa7,Kanniess Frank8,Mak Vince9,Martins Sonia10,Paulino Ema11,Pinnock Hilary12,Roman Miguel13,Sandelowsky Hanna14,Tsiligianni Ioanna15,van der Steen Laurine16,Weber Donatelli Fabio10

Affiliation:

1. International Primary Care Respiratory Group, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK

2. School of General Practice, Rural and Indigenous Health, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia

3. European Lung Foundation, Leamington Spa, UK

4. Life and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), School of Medicine, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal

5. Institute of Medicine, Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal

6. Bangladesh Primary Care Respiratory Society, Khulna, Bangladesh

7. British Lung Foundation Support Group, Westminster, London, UK

8. Practice for Family Medicine and Allergy, Reinfeld, Germany

9. Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK

10. ABC Medical School Brazil, Brazil

11. Ezfy, Lisbon, Portugal

12. Usher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK

13. IdSBa, Palma, Spain

14. Department of Family Medicine and Primary Care, Inst. NVS, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden

15. Faculty of Medicine, Department of Social Medicine, University of Crete, Greece

16. Hilversum, Netherlands

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic mandated a substantial switch in primary health care delivery from an in-person to a mainly remote telephone or video service. As the COVID-19 pandemic approaches its third year, limited progress appears to have been made in terms of policy development around consultation methods for the post-acute phase of the pandemic. In September 2020, the International Primary Care Respiratory Group convened a global panel of primary care clinicians – including family physicians, paediatricians, pharmacists, academics and patients – to consider the policy and health management implications of the move to remote consultations in the primary care setting. The group gave special consideration to how and how far remote consultations should be integrated into routine primary health care delivery. Remote consultations can be a useful alternative to in-person consultations in primary care not only in situations where there is a need for viral infection control but also for the routine delivery of chronic disease management. However, they may not be more time efficient for the clinician, and they can add to the workload and work-related stress for primary care practitioners if they remain the dominant consultation mode. Remote consultations are also less appropriate than in-person consultations for new disease diagnosis, dealing with multiple issues and providing complex care. Ensuring health care professionals have the appropriate skill set to effectively deliver remote consultations, administrative and/or IT support and appropriate reimbursement will be key to achieving optimal integration of remote consultations into routine clinical practice. Addressing digital access and digital literacy issues at a societal level will also be essential to ensure individuals have fair and equitable access to the internet and sufficient security for exchange of personal and health-related data.

Funder

Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3