Development of a framework for prospective payment for child mental health services

Author:

Vostanis Panos1,Martin Peter2,Davies Roger3,De Francesco Davide4,Jones Melanie5,Sweeting Ruth3,Ritchie Benjamin6,Allen Pauline7,Wolpert Miranda8

Affiliation:

1. Professor of Child Psychiatry, University of Leicester, UK

2. Lead Statistician, Evidence Based Practice Unit, University College London and the Anna Freud Centre, UK

3. Clinical Psychologist, City and Hackney CAMHS, East London Foundation Trust, UK

4. Lecturer in Statistics, University College London, UK

5. Improvement Programme Lead, Evidence Based Practice Unit, University College London and the Anna Freud Centre, UK

6. Pilot Site Manager, Evidence Based Practice Unit, University College London and the Anna Freud Centre, UK

7. Reader in Health Services Organisation, Department of Health Services Research & Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, UK

8. Director, Evidence Based Practice Unit and Child Outcomes Research Consortium, University College London and the Anna Freud Centre, London

Abstract

Objectives There is a need to develop a payment system for services for children with mental health problems that allows more targeted commissioning based on fairness and need. This is currently constrained by lack of clinical consensus on the best way forward, wide variation in practice, and lack of data about activity and outcomes. In the context of a national initiative in England our aim was to develop a basis for an improved payment system. Methods Three inter-related studies: a qualitative consultation with child and adolescent mental health services (CAMHS) stakeholders on what the key principles for establishing a payment system should be, via online survey ( n = 180) and two participatory workshops ( n = 91); review of relevant national clinical guidelines ( n = 15); and a quantitative study of the relationship between disorders and resource use ( n = 1774 children from 23 teams). Results CAMHS stakeholders stressed the need for a broader definition of need than only diagnosis, including the measurement of indirect service activities and appropriate outcome measurement. National clinical guidance suggested key aspects of best practice for care packages but did not include consideration of contextual factors such as complexity. Modelling data on cases found that problem type and degree of impairment independently predicted resource use, alongside evidence for substantial service variation in the allocation of resources for similar problems. Conclusions A framework for an episode-based payment system for CAMHS should include consideration of: complexity and indirect service activities; evidence-based care packages; different needs in terms of impairment and symptoms; and outcome measurement as a core component.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3