Fostering equitable change in health services: Using critical reflexivity to challenge dominant discourses in low back pain care in Australia

Author:

Mescouto Karime1ORCID,Olson Rebecca E2,Costa Nathalia34,Evans Kerrie56ORCID,Dillon Miriam7,Walsh Kelly8,Jensen Niamh9ORCID,Hodges Paul W10,Lonergan Kathryn11,Weier Megan12,Setchell Jenny13

Affiliation:

1. Postdoctoral Research Fellow, RECOVER Injury Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

2. Associate Professor, School of Social Science, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

3. Lecturer in Physiotherapy, Sydney School of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia

4. Adjunct Research Fellow, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

5. Group Chief Education and Research Officer, Healthia Limited, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

6. Senior Research Fellow, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia

7. PhD Candidate, School of Social Science, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

8. Senior Physiotherapist, Metro South Health Pain Rehabilitation Centre, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

9. Clinical Psychologist, Metro South Health Pain Rehabilitation Centre, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

10. Professor & NHMRC Leadership Fellow, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

11. Patient-Partner, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

12. Senior Lecturer, Centre for Social Impact, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia

13. Senior Research Fellow, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

Abstract

Objectives Justice and equity-focused practices in health services play a critical but overlooked role in low back pain (LBP) care. Critical reflexivity – the ability to examine and challenge power relations, and broader social issues embedded in everyday life – can be a useful tool to foster practices that are more socially just. No research has yet explored this approach in back pain health services. This study sought to understand how clinicians construct LBP in relation to broader socio-cultural-political aspects of care and explore if those constructions changed when clinicians engaged with critically reflexive dialogues with researchers. Methods Using critical discourse analysis methods, this qualitative study explored institutionalised patterns of knowledge in the construction of LBP care. We conducted 22 critically reflexive dialogues with 29 clinicians from two health services in Australia – a private physiotherapy clinic and a public multidisciplinary pain clinic. Results Our analyses suggested that clinicians and services often constructed LBP care at an individual level. This dominant individualistic discourse constrained consideration of justice-oriented practices in the care of people with LBP. Through dialogues, discursive constructions of LBP care expanded to incorporate systems and health service workplace practices. This expansion fostered more equitable clinical and service practices – such as assisting patients to navigate health care systems, considering patients’ socioeconomic circumstances when developing treatment plans, encouraging staff discussion of possible systemic changes to enhance justice, and fostering a more inclusive workplace culture. Although such expansions faced challenges, incorporating broader discourses enabled recommendations to address LBP care inequities. Conclusions Critical reflexivity can be a tool to foster greater social justice within health services. By expanding constructions of LBP care beyond individuals, critical reflexive dialogues can foster discussion and actions towards more equitable workplace cultures, services and systems.

Funder

National Health and Medical Research Council

University of Queensland

Arthritis Australia

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3