An evaluation of five regional health information technology-based programmes to improve health and social care coordination: A quasi-experimental controlled before/after mixed design

Author:

Salmi Louis-Rachid123ORCID,Roberts Tamara3,Renaud Thomas3,Buffeteau Sophie4,Cueille Sandrine5,Fourneyron Emmanuelle23,Gaillard Aurélie3,Abraham Maelys3,Arditi Nora3,Castry Mathieu3,Daniel Fabien3,N'gom N'deye Fatou13,Guéry Orlane3,L'Horty Yannick4,Pincemail Stéphane3,Purgues Sonia3,Thiessard Franz123,Ramel Viviane23,Langlois Emmanuel6,Saillour-Glénisson Florence123,Sibé Matthieu23,Wittwer Jérôme23,

Affiliation:

1. CHU de Bordeaux, Pôle de santé publique, Service d'Information Médicale, Bordeaux, France

2. Univ. Bordeaux, ISPED, Centre INSERM U1219-Bordeaux Population Health, Bordeaux, France

3. INSERM, ISPED, Centre INSERM U1219-Bordeaux Population Health, Bordeaux, France

4. Fédération nationale des observatoires de la santé, Paris, France

5. Univ. Pau et Pays de l'Adour, ECM-EA, Pau, France

6. Univ. Bordeaux/Sciences Po Bordeaux, Centre Emile Durkheim, Bordeaux, France

Abstract

Objectives Health information technology (HIT) can help coordinate health and social actors involved in patients’ pathways. We assess five regional HIT-based programmes (‘ Territoires de Soins Numériques’ or TSN) introduced in France, covering the period 2012–2018. Methods This was a quasi-experimental controlled before/after mixed design. We used data from the French National Health Insurance database, qualitative and quantitative surveys, and information extracted from project documents and databases. We assessed the impact of TSN using four main impact indicators: emergency room visits, unplanned hospitalizations, avoidable hospitalizations and rehospitalization within 30 days. We also collected qualitative and secondary quantitative data covering perceived needs, knowledge, use, satisfaction, adoption and understanding of projects, pathway experience, impact on professional practices and appropriateness of hospitalizations. Results TSN implemented a heterogeneous mix of HIT. Implementation was slower than expected and was not well documented. Users perceived the HIT as having a positive but weak overall effect. There were no significant differences in trends for the main impact indicators, nor on the appropriateness of hospitalizations, but favourable trends on secondary polypharmacy indicators. Conclusions If similar innovations take place in future, they should be based on a logical framework that defines causal, measurable links between services provided and expected impacts.

Funder

Ministère des Affaires Sociales et de la Santé

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3