Understanding factors influencing antibiotic prescribing behaviour in rural China: a qualitative process evaluation of a cluster randomized controlled trial

Author:

Wei Xiaolin1ORCID,Deng Simin2,Haldane Victoria3,Blacklock Claire4,Zhang Wei2,Zhang Zhitong5,Walley John D6,King Rebecca7,Hicks Joseph P8ORCID,Yin Jia9,Zou Guanyang10,Huang Yunayuan2,Vergis Mercy4,Jun Zeng11,Sun Qiang12,Lin Mei13

Affiliation:

1. Dalla Lana Chair in Global Health Policy, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Canada

2. Research Associate, China Global Health Research and Development, China

3. Doctoral student, Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Canada

4. Research Fellow, Nuffield Centre for International Health and Development, University of Leeds, UK

5. Research Fellow, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Canada

6. Professor of International Public Health, Nuffield Centre for International Health and Development, University of Leeds, UK

7. Lecturer in International Health, Nuffield Centre for International Health and Development, University of Leeds, UK

8. Lecturer in Medical Statistics, Nuffield Centre for International Health and Development, University of Leeds, UK

9. Associate Professor, School of Health Care Management, Shandong University, China

10. Associate Professor, School of Economics and Management, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, China

11. Division Director, Guangxi Autonomous Region Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, China

12. Professor and Dean, School of Health Care Management, Shandong University, China

13. Director in General, Guangxi Autonomous Region Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, China

Abstract

Objectives We conducted a qualitative process evaluation embedded in a cluster randomized controlled trial in rural Guangxi China, which successfully reduced antibiotic use for children upper respiratory tract infections. This study aims to report on the factors that influenced behaviour change among providers and caregivers in the intervention arm, and to explore contextual considerations which may have influenced trial outcomes. Methods A total of 35 in-depth interviews were carried out with hospital directors, doctors, and caregivers of children. Participants were recruited from six purposively selected facilities, including two higher performing and two lower performing facilities per trial results. Interviews were conducted in Chinese and translated to English. We also observed guideline training sessions and prescription peer review meetings. Data were analysed using framework analysis. Results Intervention-arm doctors described that training sessions improved their knowledge, skills and confidence in appropriate prescribing. This was contrasted by control arm participants who did not receive training and reported less agency in reducing prescribing rates. Prescription peer review meetings were seen as an opportunity for further education, action planning and goal setting, particularly in high performing hospitals, where these meetings were led by senior doctors who were perceived to have relevant clinical experience. Caregiver participants reported that intervention educational materials were helpful but they identified information from doctors was more useful. Providers and caregivers also described contextual health system factors, including hospital competition, short consultation times, and antibiotic availability without prescription, which shaped care preferences. Conclusions This qualitative process evaluation identified a range of factors that may have influenced behaviour among providers and caregivers leading to observed changes in reducing inappropriate antibiotic prescribing in China. Future interventions to reduce antibiotic prescribing should consider system level and wider contextual factors to better understand behaviours and patient care preferences.

Funder

Medical Research Council

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3