Case mix-based changes in health status: A prospective study of elective surgery patients in Vancouver, Canada

Author:

Sutherland Jason M1ORCID,Crump R Trafford2,Karimuddin Ahmer A3,Liu Guiping4,Wing Kevin5,Janjua Arif6,Isaac Kathryn7

Affiliation:

1. Centre for Health Services and Policy Research, School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada

2. Department of Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta

3. Section of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada

4. Centre for Health Services and Policy Research, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada

5. Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada

6. Rhinology and Skull Base Surgery, Department of Surgery, Division of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada

7. Plastic Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Abstract

Introduction Hospital activity is often measured using diagnosis-related groups, or case mix groups, but this information does not represent important aspects of patients’ health outcomes. This study reports on case mix-based changes in health status of elective (planned) surgery patients in Vancouver, Canada. Data and methods We used a prospectively recruited cohort of consecutive patients scheduled for planned inpatient or outpatient surgery in six acute care hospitals in Vancouver. All participants completed the EQ-5D(5L) preoperatively and 6 months postoperatively, collected from October 2015 to September 2020 and linked with hospital discharge data. The main outcome was whether patients’ self-reported health status improved among different inpatient and outpatient case mix groups. Results The study included 1665 participants with completed EQ-5D(5L) preoperatively and postoperatively, representing a 44.8% participation rate across eight inpatient and outpatient surgical case mix categories. All case mix categories were associated with a statistically significant gain in health status ( p < .01 or lower) as measured by the utility value and visual analogue scale score. Foot and ankle surgery patients had the lowest preoperative health status (mean utility value: 0.6103), while bariatric surgery patients reported the largest improvements in health status (mean gain in utility value: 0.1515). Conclusions This study provides evidence that it was feasible to compare patient-reported outcomes across case mix categories of surgical patients in a consistent manner across a system of hospitals in one province in Canada. Reporting changes in health status of operative case mix categories identifies characteristics of patients more likely to experience significant gains in health.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy

Reference25 articles.

1. Busse R, Geissler A, Quentin W, et al. Diagnosis-related groups in Europe moving towards transparency, efficiency and quality in hospitals. In: Busse R, Geissler A, Quentin W, et al. (eds) 1st ed. Maidenhead: Open University Press, 2011, pp. 1–568.

2. Editorial: Hospital case payment systems in Europe

3. Measuring Health

4. Using Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Quality Improvement in Clinical Genetics: an Exploratory Study

5. Patient-Reported Outcomes to Support Medical Product Labeling Claims: FDA Perspective

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3