Australian pharmacy perspectives on increasing access to medicines through reclassification

Author:

Mey Amary1ORCID,King Michelle2,Kelly Fiona3,Grant Gary4,Townshend James5,Baumann-Birkbeck Lyndsee6,Woods Phillip5ORCID,Hope Denise7

Affiliation:

1. Research Fellow, School of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Australia

2. Senior Lecturer, School of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Australia

3. Senior Lecturer, School of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Griffith University, Australia

4. Deputy Head of Learning and Teaching, School of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Australia

5. Lecturer, School of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Griffith University, Australia

6. Associate Lecturer, School of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Australia

7. Lecturer, School of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Quality Use of Medicines Network, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Australia

Abstract

Objectives Availability of medicines without prescription can increase consumers’ timely access to treatment and promote self-management of minor ailments and adherence to long-term medications. Globally, access to relevant medicines has improved through increased reclassification of medicines from prescription to non-prescription availability. However, Australian reclassification lags behind countries with comparable health systems, and the factors influencing this are poorly understood. Methods Semi-structured interviews were conducted during May 2015 to explore the perspectives of Australian pharmacists and support staff on future reclassification. Interview responses were transcribed verbatim, and the data were analysed thematically, primarily informed by the general inductive approach. Results Participants identified a broad range of medicines as candidates for future reclassification by applying risk versus benefit judgements, assessing any medicines with potential for misuse and hazardous medicines as unsuitable. Key drivers for change in classification were underpinned by participants’ desire to support consumers’ management of minor ailments and adherence for those on long-term therapy. Barriers to reclassification were identified by pharmacy staff as internal, negatively impacting pharmacists’ readiness for reclassification and external, negatively impacting the overall progress of change. Conclusions While the research provided valuable insights to inform the ongoing discussion on future reclassification, a larger, more representative sample is needed to confirm these findings.

Funder

Griffith University

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3