Tools for the identification of victims of domestic abuse and modern slavery in remote services: A systematic review

Author:

Tomsett Bella1ORCID,Álvarez-Rodríguez Johanna1,Sherriff Nigel1,Edelman Natalie23,Gatuguta Anne4

Affiliation:

1. School of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Brighton, Brighton, UK

2. Centre for Health Services Studies, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK

3. Independent Consultant, Trauma-informed Research, Support & Training (TRuST), Lewes, UK

4. Department of Global Health and Infection, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK

Abstract

Objective To explore the technology-based tools available for supporting the identification of victims of domestic abuse and modern slavery in remote services and consider the benefits and challenges posed by the existing tools. Methods We searched six academic databases. Studies were considered for inclusion if they were published in English between 2000 and 2023. The QuADS quality appraisal tool was used to assess the methodological quality of included studies. A narrative synthesis was conducted using the convergent integrated approach. Results Twenty-four studies were included, of which two were professional guidelines; each reported on a distinct technology-based tool for remote services. All tools related to domestic abuse and 21 focused on screening for intimate partner violence among young and mid-life women (18–65) in high-income countries. The review did not identify tools that support the identification of victims of modern slavery. We identified eight common themes of tool strengths, highlighting that the remote approach to screening was practical, acceptable to victims, and, in some circumstances, elicited better outcomes than face-to-face approaches. Five themes pointed to tool challenges, such as concerns around privacy and safety, and the inability of computerised tools to provide empathy and emotional support. Conclusions Available technology-based tools may support the identification of victims of domestic abuse by health and social care practitioners in remote services. However, it is important to be mindful of the limitations of such tools and the effects individuals’ screening preferences can have on outcomes. Future research should focus on developing tools to support the identification of victims of modern slavery, as well as empirically validating tools for screening during remote consultations.

Funder

University of Brighton

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Reference51 articles.

1. What barriers prevent health professionals screening women for domestic abuse? A literature review

2. Such E, Laurent C, Salway S. Modern slavery and public health. London: Public Health England, 2017. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/modern-slavery-and-public-health/modern-slavery-and-public-health (accessed 31 October 2022).

3. Prevalence and risk of violence and the mental, physical and sexual health problems associated with human trafficking: an updated systematic review

4. World Health Organization. Violence against women prevalence estimates. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2021. https://www.who.int/publications-detail-redirect/9789240022256 (accessed 25 February 2024).

5. International Labour Office. Global estimates of modern slavery: forced labour and forced marriage. Geneva, Switzerland: International Labour Office, 2022.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3