Staff experiences of training and delivery of remote home monitoring services for patients diagnosed with COVID-19 in England: A mixed-methods study

Author:

Sidhu Manbinder1ORCID,Walton Holly2ORCID,Crellin Nadia3,Ellins Jo4,Herlitz Lauren5,Litchfield Ian6,Massou Efthalia7,Tomini Sonila M8,Vindrola-Padros Cecilia9ORCID,Fulop Naomi J10

Affiliation:

1. Associate Professor, Health Services Management Centre, School of Social Policy, University of Birmingham, UK

2. Research Fellow, Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, UK

3. Fellow, Nuffield Trust, London, UK

4. Senior Fellow, Health Services Management Centre, School of Social Policy, University of Birmingham, UK

5. Research Fellow, Population, Policy and Practice, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, UK

6. Senior Research Fellow, Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, UK

7. Research Associate, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, UK

8. Assistant Professor, Global Business School for Health, University College London, UK

9. Professorial Research Fellow, Department of Targeted Intervention, University College London, UK

10. Professor of Health Care Organisation and Management, Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, UK

Abstract

Objectives Remote home monitoring services for patients at risk of rapid deterioration introduced during the COVID-19 pandemic had important implications for the health workforce. This study explored the nature of ‘work’ that health care staff in England undertook to manage patients with COVID-19 remotely, how they were supported to deliver these new services, and the factors that influenced delivery of COVID-19 remote home monitoring services for staff. Methods We conducted a rapid mixed-methods evaluation of COVID-19 remote home monitoring services during November 2020 to July 2021 using a cross-sectional survey of a purposive sample of staff involved in delivering the service (clinical leads, frontline delivery staff and those involved in data collection and management) from 28 sites across England. We also conducted interviews with 58 staff in a subsample of 17 sites. Data collection and analysis were carried out in parallel. We used thematic analysis to analyse qualitative data while quantitative survey data were analysed using descriptive statistics. Results A total of 292 staff responded to the surveys (39% response rate). We found that prior experience of remote monitoring had some, albeit limited benefit for delivering similar services for patients diagnosed with COVID-19. Staff received a range of locally specific training and clinical oversight along with bespoke materials and resources. Staff reported feeling uncertain about using their own judgement and being reliant on seeking clinical oversight. The experience of transitioning from face-to-face to remote service delivery led some frontline delivery staff to reconsider their professional role, as well as their beliefs around their own capabilities. There was a general perception of staff being able to adapt, acquire new skills and knowledge and they demonstrated a commitment to continuity of care for patients, although there were reports of struggling with the increased accountability and responsibility attached to their adapted roles at times. Conclusions Remote home monitoring models can play an important role in managing a large number of patients for COVID-19 and possibly a range of other conditions. Successful delivery of such service models depends on staff competency and the nature of training received to facilitate effective care and patient engagement.

Funder

National Institute for Health Research, Health Services & Delivery Research programme_RSET

National Institute for Health Research, Health Services & Delivery Research programme_BRACE

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3