Moving upstream in health promoting policies for older people with early frailty in England? A policy analysis

Author:

Drennan Vari1ORCID,Walters Kate2,Avgerinou Christina3,Gardner Benjamin4,Goodman Claire5,Frost Rachael6,Kharicha Kalpa7,Iliffe Steve8,Manthorpe Jill9

Affiliation:

1. Professor of Health Care & Policy Research, Centre for Health & Social Care Research, Kingston University & St. George’s University of London, UK

2. Director of the Centre for Ageing & Population Studies, University College London, UK

3. Senior Clinical Research Associate, Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, UK

4. Senior Lecturer, Department of Psychology, King’s College London, UK

5. Professor of Health Care, University of Hertfordshire, UK

6. Research Associate, Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, UK

7. Senior Research Fellow, Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, UK

8. Emeritus Professor of Primary Care for Older People, Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, UK

9. Professor of Social Work, Social Care Workforce Research Unit, King’s College London, UK

Abstract

Objectives Globally, populations are rapidly ageing and countries have developed health promotion and wellbeing strategies to address increasing demand for health care and old-age support. The older population is not homogeneous however, and includes a large group in transition between being active and healthy to being frail, i.e. with early frailty. This review explores the extent to which policy in England has addressed this group with a view to supporting independence and preventing further progression towards frailty. Methods A narrative review was conducted of 157 health and social care policy documents current in 2014–2017 at three levels of the health and social care system in England. Findings We report the policy problem analysis, the shifts over time in language from health promotion to illness prevention, the shift in target populations to mid-life and those most at risk of adverse outcomes through frailty, and changes to delivery mechanisms to incentivize attention to the frailest rather than those with early frailty. We found that older people in general were not identified as a specific population in many of these policies. While this may reflect a welcome lack of age discrimination, it could equally represent omission through ageism. Only at local level did we identify some limited attention to preventative actions with people with early frailty. Conclusion The lack of policy attention to older people with early frailty is a missed opportunity to address some of the demands on health and social care services. Addressing the individual and societal consequences of adverse experiences of those with the greatest frailty should not distract from a more distinct public health perspective which argues for a refocusing upstream to health promotion and illness prevention for those with early frailty.

Funder

Health Technology Assessment Programme

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy

Reference47 articles.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3