The Third FRAME Toxicity Committee: Working toward Greater Implementation of Alternatives in Toxicity Testing

Author:

Combes Robert D.1,Balls Michael1,Bansil Lee2,Barratt Martin3,Bell David4,Botham Philip5,Broadhead Caren1,Clothier Richard4,George Elizabeth6,Fentem Julia7,Jackson Michael8,Indans Ian9,Loizou George10,Navaratnam Vyra11,Pentreath Victor12,Phillips Barry13,Stemplewski Henry14,Stewart Jane15

Affiliation:

1. FRAME, Nottingham

2. Procter & Gamble

3. Marlin Consultancy

4. University of Nottingham

5. Syngenta, CTL

6. GlaxoSmithKline

7. SEAC, Unilever Colworth

8. Consultant

9. Health & Safety Executive

10. Health & Safety Laboratory, HSE

11. Home Office, London

12. University of Salford

13. RSPCA, Horsham

14. Medicines Control Agency, London

15. AstraZeneca plc

Abstract

FRAME (the Fund for the Replacement of Animals in Medical Experiments; http://www.frame.org.uk ) is a scientific charity, which has, for over 30 years, been advocating and conducting its own research on the application of the Three Rs ( reduction, refinement and replacement) to animal experimentation. FRAME develops and validates scientifically based replacement alternative methods to facilitate their acceptance by scientists and regulators. As part of these activities, FRAME established a FRAME Toxicity Committee in 1979, and a report of its work was published in 1982, and discussed in the proceedings of a subsequent meeting, published in 1983. A Second Toxicity Committee formed in 1988, reported its work in 1990, which was discussed in the proceedings of a subsequent conference, published in 1991. The work of these committees was extremely successful and influential in laying the foundation for later activities in alternatives research. A Third FRAME Toxicity Committee was formed in 1999, since much progress had been achieved in the previous decade, especially with regard to the successful validation of several non-animal replacement methods and the start of their regulatory acceptance. Moreover, some new test methods are on the point of being validated, and many new techniques and discoveries are impacting on toxicity testing. Also, interest in reduction and refinement in toxicology has increased. However, there is considerable scope and need for the further implementation of the Three Rs in toxicity testing, especially due to recent plans for the large-scale testing of high-production volume, hormonally-active and existing chemicals, and the increasing use of transgenic animal models. The new committee comprises 18 experts from industry, academia, animal welfare, legislative and regulatory bodies, with one observer from the UK Government Home Office. The main objective is to review progress made in the application of the Three Rs in the development and safety evaluation of medicines, biologicals, cosmetics, agrochemicals and other products, as well as industrial chemicals, and to make recommendations as a basis for further sensible progress according to sound scientific and ethical criteria. The main committee is to be augmented by several working parties that will focus on specific scientific issues: 1) targeted risk assessment versus hazard identification; 2) data sharing; 3) endocrine disruption; and 4) carcinogenicity testing. The Committee is also to publish a status report on the current situation regarding alternatives in toxicity testing, based on the recommendations of the Second Toxicity Committee, and will organise a conference to discuss its overall conclusions and recommendations.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Medical Laboratory Technology,Toxicology,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,General Medicine

Reference32 articles.

1. The Fund for the Replacement of Animals in Medical Experiments (FRAME): 23 Years of Campaigning for the Three Rs

2. BallsM., RiddellR.J. & WordenA.N. eds (1983). Animals and Alternatives in Toxicity Testing, 550 pp. London, UK and New York, NY, USA: Academic Press.

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3