Factors Related to Animal Neglect in Brazilian Laboratories

Author:

Bones Vanessa Carli1,Molento Carla Forte Maiolino2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Regional Council of Veterinary Medicine of the State of Paraná (CRMV-PR) and Animal Welfare Laboratory (LABEA), Agrarian Science Sector, Federal University of Paraná (UFPR), Curitiba, Brazil

2. Animal Welfare Laboratory (LABEA), Federal University of Paraná (UFPR), Curitiba, Brazil

Abstract

Our objectives were to identify the prevalence of negligence of laboratory animals in Brazil, to determine the primary factors associated with its occurrence and to suggest prevention strategies. A questionnaire was made available online between October 2015 and March 2016. A total of 116 respondents with experience in the use of laboratory animals and/or the use of alternative methods answered the questionnaire. Most respondents were women (77 respondents, 66.4%), a significant proportion had a degree in Veterinary Medicine (31 respondents, 27.2%), and a majority used animals in their work (88 respondents, 75.9%). Of the 88 animal users, 23 supplied information on the numbers and species of animals they used. When asked whether they knew that Brazilian law forbade animal experimentation when alternative methods exist, seven (9.1%) respondents mentioned Act 9605/1998. Most, but not all, respondents (96 respondents, 82.8%) submitted their projects to an Animal Use and Ethics Committee (AUEC), and many (65 respondents, 56%) reported their belief that animal neglect occurred at their institution. Negligence was found to be associated with: institutions where the numbers of animals used were not recorded ( p = 0.008); institutions where respondents were unaware of the relevant legislation, that is, Act 9605/1998 ( p = 0.042); or where there was evidence that not all project proposals were submitted to the AUEC or evidence of no submissions at all ( p = 0.022). Negligence of animals was found to be highly prevalent. Prevention strategies might involve increased transparency to the general public, the empowerment of individuals that work with animals to report any concerns, optimised inspection of facilities where animal work is carried out and significant improvements to the role of AUECs.

Funder

CoordenaÇão de AperfeiÇoamento de Pessoal de NÍvel Superior

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Medical Laboratory Technology,Toxicology,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,General Medicine

Reference30 articles.

1. Munro R, Munro HMC. Animal abuse and unlawful killing: forensic veterinary pathology. London: Saunders, 2008, 124 pp.

2. Santos CI. Experimentação animal e direito penal: o crime de crueldade e maus-tratos à luz da teoria do bem jurídico. Curitiba, PR: Editora Juruá, 2015, 176 pp.

3. Perceived Barriers to the Adoption of Alternatives to Laboratory Animal Use for Rabies Diagnosis

4. Beirne P. Confronting animal abuse: law, criminology, and human—animal relationships. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2009, 237 pp.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Out with the Old, In with the New!;Alternatives to Laboratory Animals;2020-01

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3