Abstract
In an attempt to evaluate cricothyroidotomy as described by Brantigan and Grow in 1976, the authors have reviewed the literature and compared it to the decade of experience following Brantigan and Grow's report. The records of over 1,000 patients requiring ventilatory assistance were reviewed. A comparison of this experience with Brantigan and Grow's original series and subsequent reports was used to establish the criteria and technique for cricothyroidotomy. It appears that while cricothyroidotomy has specific advantages, it also has disadvantages and a higher incidence of airway stenosis than either of the procedures it was designed to replace (low tracheotomy or endotracheal intubation). For this reason, its use has been severely restricted in Colorado, where it was popularized.
Subject
General Medicine,Otorhinolaryngology
Cited by
55 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Emergency cricothyroidotomy for airway management;Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews;2017-03-29
2. Emergency percutaneous tracheotomy in failed intubation;Egyptian Journal of Chest Diseases and Tuberculosis;2014-10
3. Emergency cricothyroidotomy for airway management;Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews;2014-01-13
4. Emergent Airway Management : (2)Emergent Cricothyroidotomy;THE JOURNAL OF JAPAN SOCIETY FOR CLINICAL ANESTHESIA;2014
5. Elective surgical cricothyroidotomy in oral and maxillofacial surgery;British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery;2013-12