Individual SNOT-22 Items Aid in Differentiating Between Spontaneous Cerebrospinal Fluid Rhinorrhea and Chronic Rhinosinusitis Without Nasal Polyps

Author:

Liu Matthew Y.12ORCID,Gardner James Reed3,Woodworth Bradford A.4,Jang David W.5,Kanaan Alissa3,Radabaugh Jeffrey Paul6,Yao William C.6ORCID,Goros Martin7,Challa Megana2,Grayson Jessica W.4,Wang Zhu7,Chen Philip G.2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA

2. Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA

3. Division of Rhinology and Allergy, Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (UAMS), Little Rock, AR, USA

4. Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA

5. Department of Head and Neck Surgery & Communication Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA

6. Department of Otorhinolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX, USA

7. Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA

Abstract

Objectives: Spontaneous cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) rhinorrhea is a diagnostic challenge due to its overlapping symptomatology with other sinonasal diseases. The objective of this study was to investigate whether items on the sinonasal outcome test (SNOT)−22 could suggest a diagnosis of spontaneous CSF rhinorrhea versus chronic rhinosinusitis without nasal polyps (CRSsNP). Methods: A multi-institutional retrospective chart review of patients with spontaneous CSF rhinorrhea and a control group of CRSsNP patients was performed. Individual SNOT-22 scores and domain scores were compared. Results: One hundred fifteen patients were included in both cohorts. Of the patients in the CSF rhinorrhea group, 48% were misdiagnosed as chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) prior to the correct identification of a CSF leak. On bivariate analysis, the CSF rhinorrhea group scored significantly higher on the SNOT-22 for runny nose ( P < .001) and was more likely to designate this symptom as most important ( P < .001). The CRSsNP group scored significantly higher in nasal blockage ( P < .001), thick nasal discharge ( P < .001), facial pain/pressure ( P < .001), and in the ear/facial ( P < .001) and rhinologic ( P = .003) domains. Multivariable logistic regression revealed that runny nose ( P < .001) was most predictive of spontaneous CSF rhinorrhea while nasal blockage ( P < .001), thick nasal discharge ( P < .001), and facial pain/pressure ( P = .001) were predictive of CRSsNP after adjusting for relevant confounders. No significant difference was observed in total SNOT-22 scores between groups ( P = .676). Conclusions: Spontaneous CSF rhinorrhea is commonly misdiagnosed as other sinonasal pathologies. However, individual SNOT-22 items can help aid in suggesting a CSF leak. Spontaneous CSF rhinorrhea should be suspected in patients who have high SNOT-22 scores for runny nose and report this symptom as most important, but have lower scores related to the other cardinal symptoms of CRS.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Medicine,Otorhinolaryngology

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3