Development of the 12-Item Facial Complaints Evaluation Scale (FaCES-12)

Author:

Higgins Thomas S.12ORCID,Shutt Travis A.1,Ting Jonathan Y.3,Illing Elisa A.3,Tang Dennis M.4,Kosaraju Nikitha5ORCID,Potts Kevin1,Cash Liz1,Liu David1,Sheeley Kathleen A.2,Wu Arthur W.4

Affiliation:

1. Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY, USA

2. Rhinology, Sinus & Skull Base, Kentuckiana Ear, Nose & Throat, Louisville, KY, USA

3. Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA

4. Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA

5. David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA

Abstract

Objectives: Chronic rhinosinusitis and related rhinologic disorders are common in routine otolaryngologic practice. Common presenting symptoms include nasal obstruction, facial pain, facial pressure, headache, and a subjective feeling of the face feeling “swollen,” a perceptual distortion. No validated scale exists to assess facial pain in addition to perceptual distortion or headache. The objective was to develop a novel scale for assessment of facial symptoms experienced by patients presenting for rhinologic evaluation. Methods: This was a prospective validation cross-sectional study. A patient questionnaire, the 12-item Facial Complaints Evaluation Scale (FaCES-12), was created to evaluate facial symptoms based on clinical experience and the literature, including severity and timing of facial pain, facial pressure, facial perceptual swelling, and headache. Each item was assessed utilizing an 11-point Likert scale ranging from 0 to 10 in severity. Data was collected prospectively from 210 patients in 1 private and 2 academic otolaryngologic practices from August to December 2019 along with the PROMIS Pain Intensity Scale 3a and 22-Item Sino-nasal Outcome Test. Construct validity was determined using Pearson correlation and exploratory factor analysis. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were assessed by calculating Cronbach’s alpha and assessing test-retest scores. Results: A new 12-item scale named FaCES-12 was developed. FaCES-12 demonstrated high reliability with a Cronbach’s alpha of .94 and high test-retest reliability ( r = .90). The scale revealed very strong correlation with the PROMIS Pain Intensity Scale 3a ( r = .81) and moderate correlation with the Sino-nasal Outcome Test ( r = .48). Exploratory factor analysis demonstrated the scale contained interrelated variables that measured unique components of facial sensations. Conclusion: The FaCES-12 is a valid and reliable instrument for use in the evaluation of facial symptoms. Further research into the application of this scale is warranted.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3