Effects of Fenestra Size and Piston Diameter on the Outcome of Stapes Surgery for Clinical Otosclerosis

Author:

Gristwood Ronald Edward,Venables William Norman

Abstract

Objectives: We determined the effect of piston diameter (0.8 or 0.6 mm) and fenestra size (total, three-quarter, or half removal or calibrated stapedotomy) on hearing gains after stapes surgery for clinical otosclerosis. Methods: We analyzed the mean air conduction hearing gains at various frequencies in a sample of 911 strictly consecutive patients who underwent 1,168 stapes procedures with piston reconstruction carried out by the same surgeon between 1963 and 1979. Assiduous follow-up of patients was attempted for at least 10 years, and in some cases for 20 years. Results over time at the various audiometric frequencies were stored for computer analysis. Results: There is no apparent advantage of one piston diameter (0.8 or 0.6 mm) over another for hearing gains at 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, and 4 kHz. The slim piston appeared to have a significant advantage for 6 and 8 kHz at 5 to 10 years after operation, but interpretation here requires caution, because the slim piston was usually chosen for cases with a small fenestra. Of the various sizes of footplate fenestras, total removal of the stapes footplate had significantly worse air conduction results, most clearly demonstrated at higher frequencies. Below 2 kHz, there is only weak evidence that the means differ significantly at all for the different sizes of fenestra. Small fenestras (stapedotomies) appear to offer advantages for hearing gains, particularly at the higher frequencies of 3 to 8 kHz, and for at least 10 years. Conclusions: The diameter (0.6 or 0.8 mm) of the pistons selected for reconstruction after stapes surgery appears to have little effect on the outcome, except perhaps at 6 and 8 kHz, where the slim piston appeared to have a significant advantage. The size of the footplate fenestra is of paramount importance to the outcome. A small footplate fenestra has statistically significant advantages for hearing gain over all other sizes of fenestra (ie, total, three-quarter, or half removal of the footplate), at least for the first 10 years after surgery, at frequencies of 2 kHz and above. Total stapedectomy has given the worst results for hearing gain at frequencies above 2 kHz, and the rate of deterioration of gain over time seems to be more rapid than after small-fenestra techniques. Small fenestras are recommended as the preferred technique in all cases of surgically treatable otosclerosis.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Medicine,Otorhinolaryngology

Cited by 14 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3