Stigma and the use of umbrellas, hiking poles and walking sticks to aid walking in Hong Kong

Author:

Maximo Tulio1ORCID,Fong Kenneth NK1,Lau Newman ML1

Affiliation:

1. The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China

Abstract

Background The use of walking aids is widely acknowledged as one of the most relied-on forms of assistive technology. Using stick-shaped devices, such as a cane, is often the entrance for many people to the world of assistive technologies, often accompanied by the negative stigma associated with ageing and disability. Objectives This study investigated the perception of disability and needs of the Hong Kong population using walking aids, aiming to inform device design and service provision. Methods We observed 391 individuals using cane-like devices in their natural environment and conducted semi-structured interviews with 28 participants to understand stigma, barriers to acquisition, training, and design requirements. Results Half of the interviewees (50%, n = 14) did not feel disabled when using a walking stick, while 39% felt slightly disabled. 56% of the observed sample used non-medical-looking aids like hiking poles or umbrellas. Most interviewees (79%) purchased off-the-shelf devices, but less than half received seller support in choosing appropriate aids. Conclusion The feelings associated with using walking sticks and similar devices are mostly positive. There is a preference in Hong Kong for using devices without a medical appearance to aid walking, such as umbrellas and hiking poles. There is a need to raise awareness of the risks of using umbrellas to aid walking and empower the user to make informed decisions when purchasing walking aid devices. In addition, there is a need to support the supply chain of walking aids, including umbrellas and hiking poles, to provide more information on device use, misuse, training, and maintenance.

Funder

University Grants Committee

Publisher

SAGE Publications

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3